If you say wuhan virus you are a racist and xenophobic

[Gandalf]

You have said I beg to be called a racist and have called me a racist and I have no idea what that means. If you cannot handle reality then please move to a parallel universe. The facts do not care about your sensibilities.

You keep bringing me up and I haven't got a clue why.

[Beanz]

You have said I beg to be called a racist and have called me a racist and I have no idea what that means. If you cannot handle reality then please move to a parallel universe. The facts do not care about your sensibilities.

You keep bringing me up and I haven't got a clue why.

You do beg to be called a racist. You repost stuff from racists as 'evidence'. You do this almost compulsively.

And then cry about people pointing out that you doing so and repeating the rubbish from racists makes you seem a bit..... Racist.

The fact remains though that NOBODY in this entire thread called you or Walrus or El Kabong a racist for using the term 'Wuhan Virus'.

So as ever. The PC crowd brow beating everyone turns out to be you lot.

As usual.

Lol

[Gandalf]

You have said I beg to be called a racist and have called me a racist and I have no idea what that means. If you cannot handle reality then please move to a parallel universe. The facts do not care about your sensibilities.

You keep bringing me up and I haven't got a clue why.

You do beg to be called a racist. You repost stuff from racists as 'evidence'. You do this almost compulsively.

And then cry about people pointing out that you doing so and repeating the rubbish from racists makes you seem a bit..... Racist.

The fact remains though that NOBODY in this entire thread called you or Walrus or El Kabong a racist for using the term 'Wuhan Virus'.

So as ever. The PC crowd brow beating everyone turns out to be you lot.

As usual.

Lol

Do you deny the data?

[Gandalf]

Is Jordan Peterson racist? Is Sam Harris racist? Is Wikipedia racist? Nobody disputes that there are group differences and all I posit is that they exist and we do not know for sure why. That is all I ever posit and all it gets is 'racist' from only you and that is such a loaded word that is designed to shut down discourse. To an uninformed person it will look negative as the media, which you claim to be part of, has trained people that this is a word to look out for meaning 'baddies'. However, it is a word that is not used very cautiously and is in essence a very insidious slur all too often. You say you are careful with your words Beanz, but that is a lie. You are calculated with how you use words is more how I would put it.

[Beanz]

Gandalf you plum, look at you still begging for someone to be called a racist so you can prove how brave you are. It is pretty funny but just as delusional as the idea that everyone with an NUJ Press Pass is trained and told how to do their job by some shadowy bogeymen.

You are an idiot.

[Gandalf]

Gandalf you plum, look at you still begging for someone to be called a racist so you can prove how brave you are. It is pretty funny but just as delusional as the idea that everyone with an NUJ Press Pass is trained and told how to do their job by some shadowy bogeymen.

You are an idiot.

You have already agreed that there are differences, so by logical extension you must be a racist too. However, I do not like how you use the term so would not use it as facts are not racist. Do you not see how anodyne you make the term by calling someone a racist for stating a fact? Would I also be a racist if I say that Corona affects blacks more than other races? It is nothing personal but a truth and we should not consider a truth racist.

I don't think I am doing anything stunning or brave by repeating information collated by scholars smarter than I. I just accept reality for what it is, and yes, rags like The Guardian have cheapened the term beyond recognition. There are genuinely nasty people out there that like to rape kids based on race or eliminate groups based on race. Haranguing me over verifiable data should be the least of your issues.

What is the conclusion 'You are an idiot' all about? See, that is poor communication.

[Beanz]

Gandalf you plum, look at you still begging for someone to be called a racist so you can prove how brave you are. It is pretty funny but just as delusional as the idea that everyone with an NUJ Press Pass is trained and told how to do their job by some shadowy bogeymen.

You are an idiot.

You have already agreed that there are differences, so by logical extension you must be a racist too. However, I do not like how you use the term so would not use it as facts are not racist. Do you not see how anodyne you make the term by calling someone a racist for stating a fact? Would I also be a racist if I say that Corona affects blacks more than other races? It is nothing personal but a truth and we should not consider a truth racist.

I don't think I am doing anything stunning or brave by repeating information collated by scholars smarter than I. I just accept reality for what it is, and yes, rags like The Guardian have cheapened the term beyond recognition. There are genuinely nasty people out there that like to rape kids based on race or eliminate groups based on race. Haranguing me over verifiable data should be the least of your issues.

What is the conclusion 'You are an idiot' all about? See, that is poor communication.

The conclusion that you are an idiot is an example of crystal clear and concise communication based upon all available evidence.