Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  3
Likes Likes:  8
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: the jab

Share/Bookmark

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    265
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    540
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: the jab

    the right way to teach the jab is to push off the back foot and slide the front foot. heres emmanuel steward showing how to throw the jab.



    but when you add a weight transfer to the jab, you free up the back foot, giving the jab a couple of useful effects.



    by freeing up the back foot you can jab and circle left. the idea is to side step the opponent's punches and keep him locked in a perpetual state of turning to try to return you back in front of him.



    by freeing up the back foot you can jab and step back. it has the same action as the jab emmanuel steward was showing, only in reverse: you push off on the front foot and slide the back foot. when you press down on your front foot on the end of your jab - a weight transfer - you are always ready to push off on it and step back from a counter, should you need to. throw enough jabs, and you will.

    what both these jabs have in common is that the front foot will need to be anchored down and the back foot will need to be free to move. one more thing they have common is that they will keep you from getting hit back. fighters who will not learn these jabs will tend to become stationary - and hit more.

    Quote Originally Posted by Donny View Post
    Traditionally the boxers fundamental position saw them with 60% of their weight on the rear leg, 40% on the fore.
    Modern boxers have adopted a more balanced stance more suited to mobility, almost certainly benefiting from modern footwear.
    In either era, boxers were not trained to carry their weight on their front leg, as this would see them 'leaning-into' the opponent's attack.
    joe montana said he used to throw with a 90/10 weight distribution on each leg; meaning 90% weight on the back leg and 10% weight on the front leg. can you imagine getting hit by a guy throwing a right hand at you with a 90/10 weight distribution? well anyway, i don't agree that a balanced stance, lets say 50/50 on each leg, is any better than a 60/40 stance or for that matter that a 60/40 or 40/60 stance is wrong. watch niccolino locche fight. he stood up on his front leg just like an egret. how is it that one of the greatest defensive fighters ever could stand on his front leg and lean into the opponent's attack and get hit less?
    Last edited by Yuzo; 04-27-2020 at 05:38 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing