Part of the issue is that Beanz himself is an ideologue and very much part of a cult. The Labour Party at this stage fits the very definition of cult. The result is that anyone who steps out of line must be considered a heretic or evil. Lyle has the 'wrong views therefore he has to be attacked. A rational person can see that it is not so black and white. The left occasionally has the glimmer of a reasonable idea, but conservative values are also very tenable too.

To be conservative is to be by nature self responsible. How could anyone be against that unless they do not genuinely think people are capable of running their own lives? Beanz refuses to countenance the notion that Lyle might actually have anything valid or meaningful to add or that Beanz himself might have got things wrong. Is,Lyke against helping others? No, but he does not think government, which is inefficient, needs to hold everyone's hand. Why should it?

The state of the West today is not because Cultural Marxism is making it better. It is destroying it and I can say that myself from the position of an ethnostate where you do not have the same social problems. The borders should never have been opened, crazed ideologues not have been allowed to ruin the humanities, single motherhood should not have been promoted. The result of these things and others is social calamity.

I know because in places where common sense does prevail, where social conservatism exists, you do not get the same chaos. You don't want to start on that journey. Yes, it is change. However, society can be irreparably destroyed. Why would you ever allow that. ..unless....? And I will let you fill in your own blanks.