Alex Jones material finding its way on YouTube again. lol

[TitoFan]

I personally have no use for someone who makes shit up at will..... (mostly in a psychotic need for attention)..... no matter who he harms.

precisely why i have no use for you. you make shit up at will all the time you hypocrite

when i want your opinion I'll beat it out of you

you couldn't even beat grandma

well... not so fast there. how old/ big/ nimble is she

[TIC]

I personally have no use for someone who makes shit up at will..... (mostly in a psychotic need for attention)..... no matter who he harms.

precisely why i have no use for you. you make shit up at will all the time you hypocrite

when i want your opinion I'll beat it out of you

you couldn't even beat grandma

well... not so fast there. how old/ big/ nimble is she

doesn't matter. you're a pussy fat joe

[TitoFan]

I personally have no use for someone who makes shit up at will..... (mostly in a psychotic need for attention)..... no matter who he harms.

precisely why i have no use for you. you make shit up at will all the time you hypocrite

when i want your opinion I'll beat it out of you

you couldn't even beat grandma

well... not so fast there. how old/ big/ nimble is she

doesn't matter. you're a pussy fat joe

a pussy fat joe stomps a dick every day and twice on sundays

[TIC]

I personally have no use for someone who makes shit up at will..... (mostly in a psychotic need for attention)..... no matter who he harms.

precisely why i have no use for you. you make shit up at will all the time you hypocrite

when i want your opinion I'll beat it out of you

you couldn't even beat grandma

well... not so fast there. how old/ big/ nimble is she

doesn't matter. you're a pussy fat joe

a pussy fat joe stomps a dick every day and twice on sundays

sucks a dick more like. my grandma would out hustle you before you had a heart attack. i would only need to snap my fingers to make you piss yourself

[TitoFan]

Oops.... there you go. You did it again.

I'm afraid your 5 minutes are up.

[TIC]

Oops.... there you go. You did it again.

I'm afraid your 5 minutes are up.

grandma would only need one minute

[TitoFan]

Oops.... there you go. You did it again.

I'm afraid your 5 minutes are up.

grandma would only need one minute

That's pretty weak..... even for a brain-dead moron such as yourself.

Quit using your fucking grandma in your mindless drivel. She's got enough problems.

[SlimTrae]

Not sure where my view is on it.
On one hand, censorship isn't good. On the other, if it is a social-media platform, then i see it as a business.

A business has a right to say:
No shoes, no shirt no service.
We serve wedding cakes to he and she, not he and he, or she and she or he-she and ...well U get it.

YouTube has a right to allow and disallow whoever, whenever, however & conservatives baulk at it IMO because they can't make, build, create on a media platform -they have piss poor ingenuity unlike liberals, from Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Zucker, Karim Hurley & Chen's Ytube.

If they could, they wouldn't give a rat's ass about being censored on youtube. But they haven't so they used there ideology to make it a conspiracy that they are being denied freedom of speech.

On the media overall
Every major news paper always has a dissenting view from their major stories, In Milwaukee it is the Journal-Sentinel and there is a conservative op-ed & a liberal op-ed. So there is no banning or censoring in print media.

There is however a monopoly on radio-media. It disgusts me how incapable liberals are at addressing the disparity of right wing radio station done by repealing laws that prevented monopolization. My point? The Alex Jones of the world aren't denied entrance to radio- conservatives have that on lockdown nationwide.

On major networks that is public television NBC, ABC, CBS & FOX; there has always been anchors that were conservative- but they were awesome at keeping their opinion to themselves & delivering news be it Sam Donaldson, George Will, Tim Russert, Mike Wallace. Public television's news anchors don't really lean either way. But that is my perspective.

today - on cable that is their major focus. Selling ideology FOX on cable tv is biased for conservatism point blank. they are jacktails who inspire limited thinking, partisanship America. On the left they inspire homos, lezbos and low IQ standards.
Rachel Maddow pushes liberalism/progressivism-- & somehow on the right, they affixed cable to regular t.v. Then attach successful businesses like Twitter or YouTube as well & claim they are being denied their right to speak.
That is where I draw the line.

even if Twitter came out and said this is where we stand on politics and who we support: it is their right! Why should they suffer because those who they kick off can turn it political?

I don't like it that YouTube bans those I respect, but I'd rather come up with an alternative and visit that site- then to petition them. And I never could get use to using something called Twitter, sounds so sissified.

Let Alex Jones have his say. Better to know what his kind is saying as opposed to running them underground and having no clue.

[El Kabong]

Alex Jones should be allowed on YouTube I mean his channel is as accurate as any of the rest of the "news" channels. The Young Turks are on YouTube why? Sam Seder & The Majority Report are on YouTube why? Alex Jones is bombastic and more than a bit of a goofball, but he's harmless as far as "news" goes.

[NoSavingByTheBell]

Alex Jones should be allowed on YouTube I mean his channel is as accurate as any of the rest of the "news" channels. The Young Turks are on YouTube why? Sam Seder & The Majority Report are on YouTube why? Alex Jones is bombastic and more than a bit of a goofball, but he's harmless as far as "news" goes.

Well, well, well....

[El Kabong]

Not sure where my view is on it.
On one hand, censorship isn't good. On the other, if it is a social-media platform, then i see it as a business.

That's the crux of a lot of these arguments are they a platform or are they a publisher. If they're a platform then the thought is Free Speech applies, if they are a publisher then they're a business and can pick & choose. You see the same with Twitter & Facebook and this is the biggest issue of these companies. If you're a publisher you can be held accountable for what you publish, if you're a platform you're just allowing people a chance to express themselves.

Alex Jones should be allowed on YouTube I mean his channel is as accurate as any of the rest of the "news" channels. The Young Turks are on YouTube why? Sam Seder & The Majority Report are on YouTube why? Alex Jones is bombastic and more than a bit of a goofball, but he's harmless as far as "news" goes.

Well, well, well....

And?