US House of Representatives: Dems have smallest majority since WWII

[NoSavingByTheBell]

Hey Brock. I'm so glad you took off your double-sided mask and we're seeing the true you again.

That Trump-hating charade was frankly a bit pathetic.

Show your true colors man!

Hey Tito, how is defending Trump AND the integrity of the system against what I believe was election fraud and waiting for the litigation to go through the system, taking off a mask and seeing the real me?

Also saying it is a charade, and pathetic, you do realize that is a bit .....?
It's all good, B.

I'll give you one more go but I don't think it will make any difference. I still hate Donald Trump for his cavalier attitude towards the coronavirus and for his reckless cavalier attitude towards Mask wearing since the beginning of this pandemic.

Tito, it isnt good to see things in only black and white. Somehow to you, my defending Trump against what I see as election fraud means my hatred of things that Trump did was a charade. Those 2 positions are not mutually exclusive.

Not sure why you care if I am on a tiny island taking on water.....? Youre the one on a tiny island, B! alt-right?, you're choosing to label my view and that's fine. I just see what appears to be fraud. You don't. I think we're both good with that. A shrinking minority? It doesnt always go by how many people think something, often the "shrinking minority" position has turned out to be right throughout history. Mob rule by a cackling "majority" shouldnt change anyone's opinion. this is not going to be settled in the court of public opinion. I keep telling you that, but you keep saying the same thing here.


On the one hand you "pound the pulpit" talking about letting the courts decide.....and you're pounding your pulpit. Whats the difference? Just be happy with what you think.


and on the other you ignore the fact that courts are already throwing out cases one by one. ***the courts that have thrown out cases are lower courts, like in the past how many times the 9th circuit of SF threw out so many of Trump's cases. But Trump won many of them afterwards in the Supreme Court. There are several cases moving forward. YOu do know that, right? I think you're really being influenced by the mainstream media, and that is pathetic.

You can talk about voting for Jo... but you defend Trump with a gusto ***You dont seem to understand I am not just defending Trump, I would defend anyone against what I felt was a violation of their rights or against fraud. I am also defending the idea of free and fair elections. My gusto shouldn't be of any interest to you. But I guess I'm flattered??

not seen since the days you wanted Trump to "mow down the toothless peasants at the border." ***wow, great memory, almost as great as Beanz when he digs something up from 3 years ago. YOu're one to talk about violent language lmfao kill someone and piss on their corpse. Hypocritical for sure

Not trying to get into it with you..... but I'm a straight ahead guy with unwavering opinions. ***I never attack your opinions though. Straight ahead guy but with maybe a tiny blind spot that the way in which you keep hammering at my "gusto" and attacking what in YOUR mind is "flip-flopping", is a bit strange. And thats MY unwavering opinion

When I do change my opinion, it's because someone has given me information that I've analyzed and decided it's good enough for me to change my mind.

I'm not a flip-flopper. *** You're also not the judge of others' right to have gusto on any given thing, or of whats "good enough for them" to have their opinions that they have.
But your tone sure comes across like that. ..... and, What did I change my opinion on? I didnt vote for Trump. It is not mutually exclusive to vote for Jorgensen and defend the election process and Trump against what I feel is criminal, widespread fraud. and....you are certainly trying to "get into it with me", so stop lying Tito. It's pathetic.

Just curious, do you work for CNN?