Today In Biden Land

[El Kabong]

I guess you'll just have to make me Beanz.

Nobody thinks Biden is the new Messiah.

Unfortunately there are an awful lot of people, (many of whom are bizarrely fundamentalist evangelical Christians) who are willing to die for Trump.

Even yourself, who of course is not looking for a new Messiah or wanting to be an orange martyr, are still willing to believe and spread ridiculous conspiracies to explain his followers odd behaviour. Even you, a seemingly rational normal conservative man are willing to suspend all normal rules and conventions to excuse him an extraordinary range of lies and terrible behaviour.

So you see nobody needs to make you do anything.

You never answer questions.

Its not like it is anything new.

I already answered the question but because you didn't like it you're saying I didn't answer. That's it, that's what you're on about right now.

[El Kabong]

So none of you "Former Biden supporters"/Trump haters have shit to say about Biden bombing Syria?



The silence from you lot is deafening, you bunch of fucking hypocrites.

[Kirkland Laing]

So none of you "Former Biden supporters"/Trump haters have shit to say about Biden bombing Syria?



The silence from you lot is deafening, you bunch of fucking hypocrites.

What did you have to say about Trump bombing Syria? Could somebody dig it up please? It would be interesting to see what we had to say.

[El Kabong]

So none of you "Former Biden supporters"/Trump haters have shit to say about Biden bombing Syria?



The silence from you lot is deafening, you bunch of fucking hypocrites.

What did you have to say about Trump bombing Syria? Could somebody dig it up please? It would be interesting to see what we had to say.

Trump said "don't gas innocent citizens" Assad did and therefore missile strike.

Joe's reason for the strike

[Gandalf]

So none of you "Former Biden supporters"/Trump haters have shit to say about Biden bombing Syria?



The silence from you lot is deafening, you bunch of fucking hypocrites.

What did you have to say about Trump bombing Syria? Could somebody dig it up please? It would be interesting to see what we had to say.

Trump said "don't gas innocent citizens" Assad did and therefore missile strike.

Joe's reason for the strike

Did Assad really gas his own citizens? I have never bought into that narrative. I know the mainstream likes to claim it is so, but they claim a lot of things. Here is a recent Jimmy Dore show showing how even the BBC is taking money to be fake news. Heck, don't they get enough by fleecing the public already? The US outlets have a history of it and will even hire cronies from the CIA to spout their nonsense. In a way the US is shocking in that it actually gives these people a salary to continue their nonsense. Meanwhile a hero like Assange remains locked up for the crime of actual journalism.

[El Kabong]

So none of you "Former Biden supporters"/Trump haters have shit to say about Biden bombing Syria?



The silence from you lot is deafening, you bunch of fucking hypocrites.

What did you have to say about Trump bombing Syria? Could somebody dig it up please? It would be interesting to see what we had to say.

Trump said "don't gas innocent citizens" Assad did and therefore missile strike.

Joe's reason for the strike

Did Assad really gas his own citizens? I have never bought into that narrative. I know the mainstream likes to claim it is so, but they claim a lot of things. Here is a recent Jimmy Dore show showing how even the BBC is taking money to be fake news. Heck, don't they get enough by fleecing the public already? The US outlets have a history of it and will even hire cronies from the CIA to spout their nonsense. In a way the US is shocking in that it actually gives these people a salary to continue their nonsense. Meanwhile a hero like Assange remains locked up for the crime of actual journalism.

Fair enough, all I'm saying is Trump's approach was more measured than most

[Gandalf]

Yep, the way the media goes on you would swear he was tearing up nations like Bush. Really there was positive and negative there. Trump was complicated that way. Some will even call him weak or a lover of dictators for just trying to find middle ground. Obviously not true.

I just do not believe in the chemical attack narrative. Assad had nothing to gain by doing such a thing and he was in a decent position. Wish they would let Syria be and for Amerca to give up on the Middle East. It has cost trillions and done little except to profit those invested in death.

Let it be. Biden doing it this early while the nation is struggling is a twat.

[SlimTrae]

So none of you "Former Biden supporters"/Trump haters have shit to say about Biden bombing Syria?



The silence from you lot is deafening, you bunch of fucking hypocrites.

It would be interesting to see what we had to say.

Here is what we, overall had to say when it was during Obama's tenure to compare to Drumpf, now Biden with regards to Syria.
Enjoy!

https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...ad.php?t=76416

[SlimTrae]

For the record, I'm like everyone here- an open book. As far as I can tell, I have never ever, been pro war.
Yet it gets ignored.

Have stated a singular position on foreign policy and only backed one person Ron paul for office in all my years here. not Rand- when it came to foreign policy, but that too gets ignored.


Have always spoken ill of both parties- that gets ignored.

My record here is like everyone's -an open book. Hold me for what I've written, Do unto me as I do unto you, I'm cool with that.

[El Kabong]

All I've ever wanted in regards to war is IF America is getting involved THEN we should attempt for a decisive victory with a complete and total defeat of the enemy and we should have planned for what we want after that victory. Anything else is a waste of time, money, and most importantly the lives of our soldiers.


The MIC wants forever wars and they're getting them all gassed up again.

[SlimTrae]

It will be interesting to see if Eastern African Nations will ever be addressed by either mainstream or right wing media such as Somalia, where the previous prez had 700 troops in that country alone and most recent strikes was in December 2020. They claimed: U.S. airstrikes in Somalia kill 8 al-Shabab-linked weapons experts


U.S. Africa Command conducted two airstrikes in Somalia Thursday that killed eight, officials said.

AFRICOM said these attacks have resulted in the deaths of more than 400 civilians, security forces and government officials.

It isn't new worthy in U.S. In other words, fuck Africans, Fuck Africa. Doesn't matter how many die by bombs of foreign nations. No oil, no gas reserves, no resources- such stories are never argued for nor against by Republicans let alone Democrats.


So we are now dealing with the next narrative- A repeat: How to change political/partisan positions when Middle Eastern country x,y,z is bombed.

In this case, Once again.

Obama-Attacked Syria- here is how they sold it- videos showing graves and dead, people, Now was it based on WMD? Or something other than?




Trump--Attacked Syria- here is how he sold it- men throwing water on babies. AnyChemical burns? damaged tissues? Respiratory tract? any corpses? Any? baby-seaking chemical weapons? Note the babies receiving inhalers- look something like what some use for asthma attack...but if they're impacted by WMD- how is their skin ok? Some babies just laying there.



Biden---Attacked Syria he ordered airstrikes on buildings in Syria that the Pentagon said were used by Iranian-backed militias, in retaliation for rocket attacks on U.S. targets in neighboring Iraq.

Syria war monitoring groups said the strikes hit trucks moving weapons to a base for Iranian-backed militias in Boukamal.



And again- for the record, this is what Saddo had to say about Syria, then compared Donnie's tenure & now today

https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...ad.php?t=76416


https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/202...5031607629812/
https://www.upi.com/Defense-News/202...rly%20December.

Obama went to Congress, was denied. Trump didn't go to Congress, he was at Mara Lago dousing his steak in ketshup at the time. Biden was with his officials. It seem in POTUS we're zero for three in having a decisive victory-why else would there be a rubbermatch?

[Beanz]

I guess you'll just have to make me Beanz.

Nobody thinks Biden is the new Messiah.

Unfortunately there are an awful lot of people, (many of whom are bizarrely fundamentalist evangelical Christians) who are willing to die for Trump.

Even yourself, who of course is not looking for a new Messiah or wanting to be an orange martyr, are still willing to believe and spread ridiculous conspiracies to explain his followers odd behaviour. Even you, a seemingly rational normal conservative man are willing to suspend all normal rules and conventions to excuse him an extraordinary range of lies and terrible behaviour.

So you see nobody needs to make you do anything.

You never answer questions.

Its not like it is anything new.

I already answered the question but because you didn't like it you're saying I didn't answer. That's it, that's what you're on about right now.

No that is not it at all

"First I would like to see several examples of posters on Saddo who you have lumped together due to Biden Derangement Syndrome claiming that Biden is infallible. "

That seems to be the crux of your argument with a hell of a lot of people right across the political spectrum, from left to right, and the apolitical too. That rather than construct a decent argument, you would rather make one for them that reflects your own ludicrously crass position of thinking that some politicians are infallible or at least mostly beyond reproach. Nobody actually has suggested that is what they think though.

You are not alone in backing yourself into an ideological corner, there are a few here who spent years saying nothing as Trump spouted lie after lie, but they were silent and yet now they want to scrutinize others with a far more powerful and unforgiving microscope.

There is no balance there at all. Just you weighting everything in your favour like you have for years.

A bit like you and your fellow posters blind spot to your own constant hostility and negativity. It is in everything you post, and has been for literally years now.

[El Kabong]

No that is not it at all

"First I would like to see several examples of posters on Saddo who you have lumped together due to Biden Derangement Syndrome claiming that Biden is infallible. "

That seems to be the crux of your argument with a hell of a lot of people right across the political spectrum, from left to right, and the apolitical too. That rather than construct a decent argument, you would rather make one for them that reflects your own ludicrously crass position of thinking that some politicians are infallible or at least mostly beyond reproach. Nobody actually has suggested that is what they think though.

You are not alone in backing yourself into an ideological corner, there are a few here who spent years saying nothing as Trump spouted lie after lie, but they were silent and yet now they want to scrutinize others with a far more powerful and unforgiving microscope.

There is no balance there at all. Just you weighting everything in your favour like you have for years.

A bit like you and your fellow posters blind spot to your own constant hostility and negativity. It is in everything you post, and has been for literally years now.

The reason I used the phrase I did was because YOU and others kept accusing me of thinking Trump was ....care to guess? "Infallible" and without my ever eluding to or saying outright that he was and so in jest I used it against Kirkland and you've objected to this, why is anyone's guess.



Oh I'm hostile to you? That's a shame, I mean whatever have you done to me?

[Beanz]

No that is not it at all

"First I would like to see several examples of posters on Saddo who you have lumped together due to Biden Derangement Syndrome claiming that Biden is infallible. "

That seems to be the crux of your argument with a hell of a lot of people right across the political spectrum, from left to right, and the apolitical too. That rather than construct a decent argument, you would rather make one for them that reflects your own ludicrously crass position of thinking that some politicians are infallible or at least mostly beyond reproach. Nobody actually has suggested that is what they think though.

You are not alone in backing yourself into an ideological corner, there are a few here who spent years saying nothing as Trump spouted lie after lie, but they were silent and yet now they want to scrutinize others with a far more powerful and unforgiving microscope.

There is no balance there at all. Just you weighting everything in your favour like you have for years.

A bit like you and your fellow posters blind spot to your own constant hostility and negativity. It is in everything you post, and has been for literally years now.

The reason I used the phrase I did was because YOU and others kept accusing me of thinking Trump was ....care to guess? "Infallible" and without my ever eluding to or saying outright that he was and so in jest I used it against Kirkland and you've objected to this, why is anyone's guess.



Oh I'm hostile to you? That's a shame, I mean whatever have you done to me?

I don't give a shit if you are hostile to me. I mean hostile to everyone right across the forum. Posters, mods hell even your mates. Every thread and post you make seems to be based on how angry you are about something or someone, and has been for years.

[walrus]

No that is not it at all

"First I would like to see several examples of posters on Saddo who you have lumped together due to Biden Derangement Syndrome claiming that Biden is infallible. "

That seems to be the crux of your argument with a hell of a lot of people right across the political spectrum, from left to right, and the apolitical too. That rather than construct a decent argument, you would rather make one for them that reflects your own ludicrously crass position of thinking that some politicians are infallible or at least mostly beyond reproach. Nobody actually has suggested that is what they think though.

You are not alone in backing yourself into an ideological corner, there are a few here who spent years saying nothing as Trump spouted lie after lie, but they were silent and yet now they want to scrutinize others with a far more powerful and unforgiving microscope.

There is no balance there at all. Just you weighting everything in your favour like you have for years.

A bit like you and your fellow posters blind spot to your own constant hostility and negativity. It is in everything you post, and has been for literally years now.

The reason I used the phrase I did was because YOU and others kept accusing me of thinking Trump was ....care to guess? "Infallible" and without my ever eluding to or saying outright that he was and so in jest I used it against Kirkland and you've objected to this, why is anyone's guess.



Oh I'm hostile to you? That's a shame, I mean whatever have you done to me?

I don't give a shit if you are hostile to me. I mean hostile to everyone right across the forum. Posters, mods hell even your mates. Every thread and post you make seems to be based on how angry you are about something or someone, and has been for years.

Ha!