Good topic.
I think to truly assess the competitiveness of a fight you have to go beyond the 10-9 scores round after round.
A 10-9 round can be anything from a back-and-forth ebb and flow round, where each has his moments....... to an absolute whitewash of a round, where the ONLY reason it's not 10-8 is because there wasn't a knockdown.
A fight can have all of one or all of the other... or some combination of both. In the end, they're all 10-9 rounds.
You can have a 120-108 fight where every round was grueling and judges basically had to toss a coin to choose a winner in every round. And you can have a 120-108 fight where it was over before it even began.
My point in the Floyd-Canelo fight is that there was never a moment that you felt Canelo was in it. It was a boxing lesson for 180 seconds of EVERY round. No... Canelo was never hurt. That means NOTHING. Canelo's got a tough chin, and Mayweather was not going to risk a lucky punch (ala Canelo-Khan) by trying to hurt Canelo. So he did the smart thing. He totally and utterly shut him out. No round was even close. THAT... is not a competitive fight. Floyd, who has gone on record saying what his toughest fights have been, has never mentioned Canelo in any of those conversations.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 

Reply With Quote

. Jermal Charlo v Juan Macias Montiel last out felt a lot like that. Macias kept it right up front and very physical getting home clean lesser shots start to finish but on the card it was all Charlo. Guess many factors can seep in too as what was the group-think going in and did a guy just prove better than assumed? Did a favorite fight down to the level of etc. Mayweather v Augustus

Bookmarks