
Originally Posted by
Master
Semantics Tic. You are good at that to avoid the main point.
100%.
Which is why I'm not gonna fall into the same trap others continue to fall into with this other topic that shall remain unnamed, lest we start something here in the Boxing board.
When you have to play semantics and split insignificant hairs to make a point... you've already lost the argument.
(BTW, I don't agree that he's good at semantics. Semantics is a discipline, defined as such:
"Semantics is the study of reference, meaning, or truth.
The term can be used to refer to subfields of several distinct disciplines, including philosophy, linguistics and computer science."
I think TIC just likes being contrary without offering any real substance to his point. He feels that by raw repetition of the same wordage, he's accomplishing something, when in actuality he's not.)

Bookmarks