Derek Chisora v Kubrat Pulev

[Primo Carnera]

I had it 8-4 which is clear win for Pulev so Spicoli/Ron are right, for me the fight could not go either way but have seen Chisora given the 8 rounds.

My point still stands that Chisora has lost close decisions against non-UK fighters when he was the main man.

Hang on a minute ,
1. 2 wrongs don’t make a right. That’s plain ridiculous.2 wrongs make 2 WRONGS !
2. Who has Chisora “lost close decisions against when he was the main man?”

[Master]

I had it 8-4 which is clear win for Pulev so Spicoli/Ron are right, for me the fight could not go either way but have seen Chisora given the 8 rounds.

My point still stands that Chisora has lost close decisions against non-UK fighters when he was the main man.

Hang on a minute ,
1. 2 wrongs don’t make a right. That’s plain ridiculous.2 wrongs make 2 WRONGS !
2. Who has Chisora “lost close decisions against when he was the main man?”

Parker and Usyk could be argued to be close fights.

[Primo Carnera]

I had it 8-4 which is clear win for Pulev so Spicoli/Ron are right, for me the fight could not go either way but have seen Chisora given the 8 rounds.

My point still stands that Chisora has lost close decisions against non-UK fighters when he was the main man.

Hang on a minute ,
1. 2 wrongs don’t make a right. That’s plain ridiculous.2 wrongs make 2 WRONGS !
2. Who has Chisora “lost close decisions against when he was the main man?”

Parker and Usyk could be argued to be close fights.

He lost them both, close or not close. Nobody could have him winning them.
And anyway, he wasn’t “the main man” in either of them. He was a stepping stone for Usyk and a journeyman fight for Parker.

[palmerq]

If usyk wins again, I think we might see Joshua v Chisora fairly soon.