Honest question. I'll answer it as best I can.
The real point of the argument is that I claim GGG has a distinct disadvantage against Ginger because he's never been a bonafide super middle.
TIC argues that GGG has no such disadvantage, because GGG has fought at super middle.
I counter that having fought ONE fight at 163 hardly makes him a bonafide super middle... and thus the disadvantage argument holds.
TIC latches onto my having said that GGG has never fought at super middle as a mistake (pretty much like a dog with a bone)... and uses that technicality to try and build his argument that GGG is a legitimate super middle and thus a threat to Ginger. (Perfect example of Flawed Reasoning).
In reality, TIC is now more focused on my mistake, rather than the real point of the argument which is what I mentioned earlier.
It explains why none of the veterans here like to argue anything with TIC.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 


Reply With Quote
Bookmarks