Canelo Alvarez vs Gennady Golovkin III 17/9/22

[TitoFan]

what weight division is one sixty three point eight? you are the one making yourself look foolish, i am just correcting you where you are wrong. saying it is a given that canelo doesn't lose decisions in vegas is a lie, it's a fact canelo has lost decisions in vegas. i think anyone beating ggg next from one fifty four to one sixty eight would be a very good accomplishment

You're not a child. You know that GGG fighting one fight in his entire career weighing in at 163 doesn't amount to him being a bonafide super middle. But you act like a child when you hang onto that insignificant detail to make an asinine point.

Ginger has won TWO whole decisions in Vegas. I detailed the circumstances of both. But again you act like a child and use those two aberrations to make your point, when I've already explained the circumstances of each.

You're preparing the terrain to crow about the certain Ginger victory as a legacy building fight.

I'm here to correct you and tell you it's a given. Ginger gets no credit for beating the smaller, older man who Ginger has already robbed with Vegas judges.

You keep posting. We'll fill the thread with your bullshit.

[TitoFan]

[TIC]

what weight division is one sixty three point eight? you are the one making yourself look foolish, i am just correcting you where you are wrong. saying it is a given that canelo doesn't lose decisions in vegas is a lie, it's a fact canelo has lost decisions in vegas. i think anyone beating ggg next from one fifty four to one sixty eight would be a very good accomplishment

You're not a child. You know that GGG fighting one fight in his entire career weighing in at 163 doesn't amount to him being a bonafide super middle. But you act like a child when you hang onto that insignificant detail to make an asinine point.

Ginger has won TWO whole decisions in Vegas. I detailed the circumstances of both. But again you act like a child and use those two aberrations to make your point, when I've already explained the circumstances of each.

You're preparing the terrain to crow about the certain Ginger victory as a legacy building fight.

I'm here to correct you and tell you it's a given. Ginger gets no credit for beating the smaller, older man who Ginger has already robbed with Vegas judges.

You keep posting. We'll fill the thread with your bullshit.

where did i say ggg is a bonafide super middle? you said, the fact is ggg has fought at one sixty for his entire career. that is not a fact & you are wrong. what weight division is one sixty three? you are too full of hubris to even admit you are wrong. canelo has won more than two decisions in vegas, you don't even know what you are saying. canelo has lost two decisions in vegas, so to say it is a given that canelo doesn't lose decisions in vegas is a lie because it's a fact canelo has losts decisions in vegas. i've already told you i think this is a difficult fight for both guys & have said if canelo wins i'll call it a very good victory, the legacy building stuff is all you & you'll never hear me say that in regards to this fight. in your opinion it's a given, not mine. canelo will get no credit from you for this fight, he'll get credit from me, as will ggg should he win. you are the only one posting bullshit, you've made incorrect statements & told blatant lies

[TitoFan]

what weight division is one sixty three point eight? you are the one making yourself look foolish, i am just correcting you where you are wrong. saying it is a given that canelo doesn't lose decisions in vegas is a lie, it's a fact canelo has lost decisions in vegas. i think anyone beating ggg next from one fifty four to one sixty eight would be a very good accomplishment

You're not a child. You know that GGG fighting one fight in his entire career weighing in at 163 doesn't amount to him being a bonafide super middle. But you act like a child when you hang onto that insignificant detail to make an asinine point.

Ginger has won TWO whole decisions in Vegas. I detailed the circumstances of both. But again you act like a child and use those two aberrations to make your point, when I've already explained the circumstances of each.

You're preparing the terrain to crow about the certain Ginger victory as a legacy building fight.

I'm here to correct you and tell you it's a given. Ginger gets no credit for beating the smaller, older man who Ginger has already robbed with Vegas judges.

You keep posting. We'll fill the thread with your bullshit.

where did i say ggg is a bonafide super middle? you said, the fact is ggg has fought at one sixty for his entire career. that is not a fact & you are wrong. what weight division is one sixty three? you are too full of hubris to even admit you are wrong. canelo has won more than two decisions in vegas, you don't even know what you are saying. canelo has lost two decisions in vegas, so to say it is a given that canelo doesn't lose decisions in vegas is a lie because it's a fact canelo has losts decisions in vegas. i've already told you i think this is a difficult fight for both guys & have said if canelo wins i'll call it a very good victory, the legacy building stuff is all you & you'll never hear me say that in regards to this fight. in your opinion it's a given, not mine. canelo will get no credit from you for this fight, he'll get credit from me, as will ggg should he win. you are the only one posting bullshit, you've made incorrect statements & told blatant lies

Nitpicking bullshit details is not arguing. It's acting like a child. You presumably know what the purpose of the argument is. But you choose to hang on to bullshit, insignificant details to try to make your bullshit argument.

Go ahead and get the last word in, lest you hold your breath till you turn blue.

[TIC]

what weight division is one sixty three point eight? you are the one making yourself look foolish, i am just correcting you where you are wrong. saying it is a given that canelo doesn't lose decisions in vegas is a lie, it's a fact canelo has lost decisions in vegas. i think anyone beating ggg next from one fifty four to one sixty eight would be a very good accomplishment

You're not a child. You know that GGG fighting one fight in his entire career weighing in at 163 doesn't amount to him being a bonafide super middle. But you act like a child when you hang onto that insignificant detail to make an asinine point.

Ginger has won TWO whole decisions in Vegas. I detailed the circumstances of both. But again you act like a child and use those two aberrations to make your point, when I've already explained the circumstances of each.

You're preparing the terrain to crow about the certain Ginger victory as a legacy building fight.

I'm here to correct you and tell you it's a given. Ginger gets no credit for beating the smaller, older man who Ginger has already robbed with Vegas judges.

You keep posting. We'll fill the thread with your bullshit.

where did i say ggg is a bonafide super middle? you said, the fact is ggg has fought at one sixty for his entire career. that is not a fact & you are wrong. what weight division is one sixty three? you are too full of hubris to even admit you are wrong. canelo has won more than two decisions in vegas, you don't even know what you are saying. canelo has lost two decisions in vegas, so to say it is a given that canelo doesn't lose decisions in vegas is a lie because it's a fact canelo has losts decisions in vegas. i've already told you i think this is a difficult fight for both guys & have said if canelo wins i'll call it a very good victory, the legacy building stuff is all you & you'll never hear me say that in regards to this fight. in your opinion it's a given, not mine. canelo will get no credit from you for this fight, he'll get credit from me, as will ggg should he win. you are the only one posting bullshit, you've made incorrect statements & told blatant lies

Nitpicking bullshit details is not arguing. It's acting like a child. You presumably know what the purpose of the argument is. But you choose to hang on to bullshit, insignificant details to try to make your bullshit argument.

Go ahead and get the last word in, lest you hold your breath till you turn blue.

still can't admit you're wrong? it is not nitpicking, you are wrong & lying. what weight class is one sixty three? you said, the fact is ggg has fought at one sixty for his entire career. you are wrong. you also said canelo has won two decisions in vegas, wrong again. say it is a given that canelo doesn't lose decisions in vegas is a lie because it's a fact canelo has lost decisions in vegas. i feel you are basically a boxing casual these days

[TitoFan]

you also said canelo has won two decisions in vegas, wrong again.

Obvious mistake by me, when you know full well I meant he had lost two decisions in Vegas.

Only losers pick on keyboard slipups because they have nothing else to bring to the conversation.

Proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that, like the petulant child you are, you continue grasping at straws.

[TitoFan]

Here... you win the Golden Pacifier Award.

[TIC]

you also said canelo has won two decisions in vegas, wrong again.

Obvious mistake by me, when you know full well I meant he had lost two decisions in Vegas.

Only losers pick on keyboard slipups because they have nothing else to bring to the conversation.

Proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that, like the petulant child you are, you continue grasping at straws.

i'm happy to let that one go because you have admitted it was a mistake. what about your claim, the fact is ggg has fought at one sixty for his entire career? what weight class is one sixty three? able to admit you were wrong yet? what about your lie or incorrect statement that it is a given that canelo doesn't lose decisions in vegas? able to admit that statement is wrong or you are lying yet? it is clearly not a given because canelo lost his last fight by decision in vegas. just be a man & admit you are wrong, it's not that hard, i won't think any less of you

[NoSavingByTheBell]

whats the argument being made, that Canelo is (or isnt?) a bona fide middleweight? Honestly trying to follow it here.