Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
Quote Originally Posted by TIC View Post
anyone who is familiar with guns can hear the difference in the fire rates on the videos from this story to what you hear in reality

So what does that mean? Fake? No shooting? Nobody died? Elaborate government coverup to further some cause? What.
it means they are not the type of weapons that are claimed to have been used. therefore a lie. so this part of the story is not true. please test it for yourself so you can prove to yourself what i am saying is true. fire the same weapons that were claimed to be used in this story. record the sound of fire for over a minute, then play your recorded audio beside the audio from the story footage. it won't match

"Audio from the story footage." You mean, "audio CLAIMED to be from the story footage", don't you?

Don't they teach this in Conspiracy Theory school? Don't take anything for granted? Seems like that's Conspiracy Theory 101... surprised you missed it.

CLAIMED audio from the story footage.

Were you there when this video was recorded? Can you prove a different audio wasn't subsequently attached to video, rendering it unbelievable?

Amateurish mistake, and one that could cost you your Conspiracy Theorist badge for sure.
once you have verified what i say to be true then you will be able to confirm that all the footage that has audio of gun fire does not match what you hear in reality. so why is there a difference in fire rate between the audio on all the footage shown & what you hear in reality & why are no journalists asking that question?