Fury v Usyk is on.............!

[Master]

It is a non title fight Fury has so he could get knocked out and still face Usyk.

[Dark Lord Al]

It is a non title fight Fury has so he could get knocked out and still face Usyk.

If that happens then surely the titles would become vacant ?

[nuggetdotcom]

It is a non title fight Fury has so he could get knocked out and still face Usyk.

If that happens then surely the titles would become vacant ?

Don't be so bloody sensible!

[nuggetdotcom]

I suppose you have to give credit to Frank Warren, he has a far better record of judging boxers ability than Hearn. He backed Fury against Vlad, then again against that over hyped Wilder who couldn't be beat could he (beat 3 times by Fury)? Now he's backed the Chinaman who did a Ruiz on the juggernaut (twice). I think Hearn picks for media exposure and bums on seats rather than ability, and he's got a stable of very nice media friendly heavyweights who are second division.

[ykdadamaja]

I suppose you have to give credit to Frank Warren, he has a far better record of judging boxers ability than Hearn. He backed Fury against Vlad, then again against that over hyped Wilder who couldn't be beat could he (beat 3 times by Fury)? Now he's backed the Chinaman who did a Ruiz on the juggernaut (twice). I think Hearn picks for media exposure and bums on seats rather than ability, and he's got a stable of very nice media friendly heavyweights who are second division.

Hearn has always been more sizzle than steak.

[Spicoli]

This is very good to hear. Though I'm tempted to hold off on popping a cork until they're both standing in their respected corners prior to the bell