Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  13
Dislikes Dislikes:  12
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Heavyweights by decades

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,110
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3093
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Heavyweights by decades

    The Klit brothers only replaced Lennox because he got old. They were not better or improved.

    The old Wlad would probably have beaten AJ.

    Wilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's.

    You see strange things Mr Joe Smith.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2024
    Posts
    107
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Heavyweights by decades

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    The Klit brothers only replaced Lennox because he got old. They were not better or improved.

    The old Wlad would probably have beaten AJ.

    Wilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's.

    You see strange things Mr Joe Smith.
    Deontay isn't better tech than guys in 20s-30s, you need to prove it in full matches show the videos...,if you can't you're a liar

    klits weren't better then len you prove it in matches,I can easily show they were
    Last edited by joe smith; 01-31-2024 at 10:17 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,110
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3093
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Heavyweights by decades

    Quote Originally Posted by joe smith View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    The Klit brothers only replaced Lennox because he got old. They were not better or improved.

    The old Wlad would probably have beaten AJ.

    Wilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's.

    You see strange things Mr Joe Smith.
    Deontay isn't better tech than guys in 20s-30s, you need to prove it in full matches show the videos...,if you can't you're a liar

    klits weren't better then len you prove it in matches,I can easily show they were
    I can show you in reality. Lennox stopped Vitali.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2024
    Posts
    107
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Heavyweights by decades

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by joe smith View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    The Klit brothers only replaced Lennox because he got old. They were not better or improved.

    The old Wlad would probably have beaten AJ.

    Wilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's.

    You see strange things Mr Joe Smith.
    Deontay isn't better tech than guys in 20s-30s, you need to prove it in full matches show the videos..., if you can't you're a liar

    klits weren't better then len you prove it in matches,I can easily show they were
    I can show you in reality. Lennox stopped Vitali.
    Wilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's.you need to prove it in full matches show the videos..., if you can't you're a liar

    1 match doesn't work on me, Vitali fought 10 years after that, you said for a fact they weren't better or improved i can show for a fact Vitali 10 years after that match with Len was way more advanced than Len ever was, which means you lied

    His brother wlad even fought longer than Vit and he was even way more advanced than Len ever was to

    And the opponents matter too so even the average person Len fought wasn't even close to as advanced as guys Klits fought, so you really exposed yourself bad
    Last edited by joe smith; 01-31-2024 at 01:37 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,110
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3093
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Heavyweights by decades

    Quote Originally Posted by joe smith View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by joe smith View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    The Klit brothers only replaced Lennox because he got old. They were not better or improved.

    The old Wlad would probably have beaten AJ.

    Wilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's.

    You see strange things Mr Joe Smith.
    Deontay isn't better tech than guys in 20s-30s, you need to prove it in full matches show the videos..., if you can't you're a liar

    klits weren't better then len you prove it in matches,I can easily show they were
    I can show you in reality. Lennox stopped Vitali.
    Wilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's.you need to prove it in full matches show the videos..., if you can't you're a liar

    1 match doesn't work on me, Vitali fought 10 years after that, you said for a fact they weren't better or improved i can show for a fact Vitali 10 years after that match with Len was way more advanced than Len ever was, which means you lied

    His brother wlad even fought longer than Vit and he was even way more advanced than Len ever was to

    And the opponents matter too so even the average person Len fought wasn't even close to as advanced as guys Klits fought, so you really exposed yourself bad
    You are exposing yourself. Wlad got stopped a couple of times to unremarkable boxers. Vitali opponents got worse the longer he went on.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2024
    Posts
    107
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Heavyweights by decades

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by joe smith View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by joe smith View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    The Klit brothers only replaced Lennox because he got old. They were not better or improved.

    The old Wlad would probably have beaten AJ.

    Wilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's.

    You see strange things Mr Joe Smith.
    Deontay isn't better tech than guys in 20s-30s, you need to prove it in full matches show the videos..., if you can't you're a liar

    klits weren't better then len you prove it in matches,I can easily show they were
    I can show you in reality. Lennox stopped Vitali.
    Wilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's.you need to prove it in full matches show the videos..., if you can't you're a liar

    1 match doesn't work on me, Vitali fought 10 years after that, you said for a fact they weren't better or improved i can show for a fact Vitali 10 years after that match with Len was way more advanced than Len ever was, which means you lied

    His brother wlad even fought longer than Vit and he was even way more advanced than Len ever was to

    And the opponents matter too so even the average person Len fought wasn't even close to as advanced as guys Klits fought, so you really exposed yourself bad
    You are exposing yourself. Wlad got stopped a couple of times to unremarkable boxers. Vitali opponents got worse the longer he went on.
    I'm done responding to you liar you have said Deontay wasn't more advanced than 20s-30s I said twice to show it you refuse, now are saying Wlad and vit opponents were worse no proof of this you're a lunatic liar

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,110
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3093
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Heavyweights by decades

    How can I prove to you how wild Wilder is to you by making a video?
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. British boxing – The Decades
    By Memphis in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-16-2020, 03:01 PM
  2. Top 10 Heavyweights
    By superheavyrhun in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-06-2016, 04:04 AM
  3. Name 5 ACTIVE boxers who have fought in 4 decades?
    By CutMeMick in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 06-06-2014, 05:26 AM
  4. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-28-2008, 10:54 AM
  5. Two Decades Later. Marvelous Marvin Returns!
    By SigmaMu in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-03-2007, 02:03 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing