70s-90s compared to 30s boxers

[joe smith]

So you are comparing 20 years over 10 years. Those 20 years had most of the best heavyweights in the history.

The 70-90's boxers were better than most of todays boxers so what does that do your theory that fighters get better each generation?

Wilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's. This is you're comment so prove they we're show the matches why is this the 3rd day asking this now?

[NoSavingByTheBell]

So you are comparing 20 years over 10 years. Those 20 years had most of the best heavyweights in the history.

The 70-90's boxers were better than most of todays boxers so what does that do your theory that fighters get better each generation?

Wilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's. This is you're comment so prove they we're show the matches why is this the 3rd day asking this now?

Master Has asked you a straightforward and valid question which you cannot seem to refute. So you have resorted to ad hominem insults and milktoast.

[joe smith]

So you are comparing 20 years over 10 years. Those 20 years had most of the best heavyweights in the history.

The 70-90's boxers were better than most of todays boxers so what does that do your theory that fighters get better each generation?

Wilder is raw and no better technique than the fighters you criticise in the 1920's. This is you're comment so prove they we're show the matches why is this the 3rd day asking this now?

Master Has asked you a straightforward and valid question which you cannot seem to refute. So you have resorted to ad hominem insults and milktoast.

Can you not read good? Did you not see him say what I said he did? Or do you think that comment doesn't exist still on the page where he said it? I need the proof that he said and then I'll need proof most 70s-90s boxers were better than now