Canelo really does not want to fight Benavidez!

[TIC]

1, i can only give my opinion. dmitry should have taken the offer from canelo for the same terms because it was the only offer (therefore the best offer), it was still good money for dmitry & another high profile fight, it was better than remaining inactive for over a year to end up fighting lyndon arthur

2, addressed the point, david b was not disciplined & lost his belt twice, if not for his own actions he would have still held a belt when canelo officially moved back to super middle. the fight was there if canelo wanted it, maybe canelo didn't want to give a payday to david b, just like he didn't give a payday to david morrell or william scull who were both ahead of david b in the mandatory rotation

unfortunately you & i are not debating, i am giving you questions to ask before making your points. i don't expect anything from you

Well this whole forum is based on debating ? And I gave you questions first.

this forum is based on posting thoughts (mainly about boxing)

i just answered your questions. the usual format of a debate is to first lay out your argument, not ask questions

[Primo Carnera]

1, i can only give my opinion. dmitry should have taken the offer from canelo for the same terms because it was the only offer (therefore the best offer), it was still good money for dmitry & another high profile fight, it was better than remaining inactive for over a year to end up fighting lyndon arthur

2, addressed the point, david b was not disciplined & lost his belt twice, if not for his own actions he would have still held a belt when canelo officially moved back to super middle. the fight was there if canelo wanted it, maybe canelo didn't want to give a payday to david b, just like he didn't give a payday to david morrell or william scull who were both ahead of david b in the mandatory rotation

unfortunately you & i are not debating, i am giving you questions to ask before making your points. i don't expect anything from you

Well this whole forum is based on debating ? And I gave you questions first.

this forum is based on posting thoughts (mainly about boxing)

i just answered your questions. the usual format of a debate is to first lay out your argument, not ask questions

But that’s the point , you never. And for the record, I “laid out my argument “ although I would say it was more a point of view than argument, which you disputed.
That’s when I asked a question, merely to highlight my point of view.
Btw. Your final sentence was a bit rich considering all you ever do is ask questions.

[TIC]

you replied to my original question about the dmitry rematch

i have answered your questions

your point was that david b moved up because he was tired of waiting, that maybe true, my point was if david b had of been disciplined he still would have held a belt when canelo officially moved back to super middle

you think canelo never wanted the david b fight for whatever reason, i just think canelo didn't want to give david b a payday after a certain point for whatever reason, not that he is afraid of him

i was explaining the usual format of a debate, since you felt the need to try & explain the fundamentals of debating to me

what's wrong with asking questions?