Quote Originally Posted by Punisher136
Quote Originally Posted by superheavyrhun
Quote Originally Posted by Sugar_Shaw
Great idea and the winner of the tourny gets Vitali...even if Wlad wins
Surely Vitali against Wladimir Klitschko would be a promoter's dream and a parents' nightmare. I reckon that, just like when my mates' used to fight their brothers', that the older brother wins simply cause Vitali used to beat Wladimir up when they were about 12 and 6 years old, and Wladdy will never be able to overcome that.
im not a fan of pro tournaments in boxing but in this day and age it'll take something like that to make a clear picture heres what i have in mind:

There's only 4 major belts but theres 4 other semi legit belts as well so here what you do. You set up a 16 man bracket. Each belt orgs champ vs their #1 contender (ibf would face ibf #1 contender and so on). In the event that a champ holds two belts theres a kinda play in match like the ncaa tournament in which case it would be Ibf contender vs Ibo contender and winner of that match goes up against said ibf and ibo champion. This way you get the mandatories and total unification match in one sweeping motion. You crown the winner the ring champ and horray we have a respectable heavyweight picture.
If you're gonna unify thats exactly what you have to do. Having a tournament that gets a few of the belts together isn't gonna cut it. You need to have a tournament that unifies the belts into one solid title instead of removeable pieces.