Re: HOLDING: STRATEGY, CHEATING, OR BOTH?

Originally Posted by
Violent Demise

Originally Posted by
Memphis
VD you dont have to talk bollocks the entire time your on here you do know that dont you?
Why is that if one is not always singing Hatton's praises, it's consider talking "bullocks"?

Originally Posted by
Memphis
Half his fights? You havent seen half his fights = Talking bollocks.
Heh heh heh.
Alright ladies...calm down...don't make me have to moderate 'cho ass!
Oh wait...one of you is a moderator...I humbly, drunkenly apologize.
That being said...I didn't click the link...but the thread title "Re: HOLDING: STRATEGY, CHEATING, OR BOTH?"...I'm assuming it's in regards to Hatton's style.
So...my thoughts?
I aint a fan of Hatton's style. Not just the holding...but the brawly bullish type. But that's just me. I'm more of a defensive fighter fan & love techy counter punchers.
The thing about Hatton is...it works for him & that's all that counts I suppose. I don't like it, though. I think that he holds on entirely too long & there are times that I believe he needs to lose a point or so for it...but it is what it is.
Take Wlad for instance...he's been pushed into the holding tactics that he pulls. Steward schooled him into the hit & hold fighter that he's become...still...I don't like that either.
Wrestling bothers me to no end...that being said...I don't see it as cheating...just another weapon in the arsenal.
Never beg a 40 dollar hooker...specially after she's just turned down your mom's credit card!!
Bookmarks