Quote Originally Posted by VanChilds
Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan
I don't see how anybody could think the second ODLH-Mosley fight was a "robbery."

Maybe a slightly bad decision (although not IMO I thought Mosley won it close) but no way was it a "robbery." Mosley landed the far more effective punches, ODLH got WAY too much credit for punches that didn't even land, Lampley would just talk about that great ODLH "flurry", except that most of the punches didn't even land.
I know compubox doesn't mean everything, but if I recall right there was a big disparity in favor of Oscar
Even though Oscar got way too much credit for missing punches, I'm not surprised that he landed more. But they were such ineffective punches, Shane's on the other hand were effective punches, definitely his body punching.

I just never got the whole outrage over the supposed robbery. Oscar landed more, Shane landed much better punches. I can see giving it to Oscar by a round or two but it wasn't a robbery, it wasn't like Oscar dominated or anything, although you would have thought so listening to Lampley.