I don't. I was just saying that it happens. Tsypko against Lacy is another example imo. But I agree that this anecdotal evidence; I don't think badly of American judges, my point was merely that any German-based fighter fighting an American in America takes on extra risk. Especially if you compare it to the home advantage that - admittedly - have benefited some German-based fighters when it comes to a decision in Germany. Risk-reward...Originally Posted by eagle
(Also, since you mentioned Abraham against - of all people - Jermain Taylor, I think it is a relevant point)
For every Ricky Hatton there is a Joe Calzaghe. Sorry, just couldnt help thinking that.Originally Posted by eagle
I agree with your statements, and I would like them to do cross the pond and meet the best myself. It would be amazing if boxers thought more of legacy and less of money. But the rational answer to your original question remains: Why take on bigger risks for lesser money? And you point to Hatton to prove that if might not make lesser money. Well, kudos to Hatton for having confidence (and a fan-friendly style), but Dzindiruk aint gonna break the bank by beating Ouma, and he sure as hell wont do it by losing to Ouma. So it is a risky business, compared to staying in Germany. And perhaps it just requires more confidence and bigger talents than most boxers - German, UK, Thai, etc - have.
And I really hate to repeat myself, but Sturm tried the trick. It hardly worked. You mentioned Lacy, well then you've got Tsypko. In all honesty there are probably more of those examples than of the Ricky Hattons's.
Bookmarks