Quote Originally Posted by Starr
Quote Originally Posted by mucho testosterone

I remember when Holyfield, my all time favorite fighter, beat Tyson....his strategy was to hold Tyson when he got too close and walk him to the ropes. He did more holding in that fight then Wladimir did in his last two fights yet everyone called Holy a genius for implementing that strategy.
Because Holyfield was the underdog and they wanted him to beat Tyson. yet when he did things similar they also called him "not real"
Really, cause I don't remember Holy catching flak over that, I remember people giving him a hard time about fighting in spurts towards the end of his career though.


My point is this........how do you get to write articles for a boxing forum that are that bias??

It seems to me that if you are writing articles to inform the public of a sports event that has transpired, you have to put your personal bias' and favoritisms aside, or at least make them a little more subtle which is exaclty the opposite of what this guy did.

And you got to love it when the guy says that Corrie Sanders is a golfer who beat Wlad so this somehow is supposed to lessen Wlads credibility??

Yes, Corrie Sanders had one of the most powerful left hands in the business at the time and his record is full of wins by KO in the first 2 rounds.

Yes, Wlad should have won that fight and it was not a highpoint in his career but don't make it sound like he got beat by Arnold Palmer or Tiger Woods or some shat......the guy golfs on the side for sakes!

This guy either didn't watch the fight or doesn't really understand boxing