Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 109

Thread: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

Share/Bookmark
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    405
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    978
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    Quote Originally Posted by tonythedon
    It angers me that such stupidness is among boxing supporters and this comment is so illogical that i have two words for the creator of this thread.....shut up
    Too true. Anyone who cant give Calzaghe respect and credit these days needs to have a serious word with themselves.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Lincoln ENG
    Posts
    6,125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1284
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
    Quote Originally Posted by The Magic Man
    That is a thing that truely bewilders and somewhat upsets me

    Many people know, and even question whether joe could take on a james toney at 168 prime for prime..

    And toney was one of the very very best in the division and at middleweight

    And while not many will outright say Joey c beats toney,

    Everyone hear either suspects or knows that toney wont have a mark on the legacy that calzaghe probably will

    Its a funny old game..


    Thats why I said it depends on the version of Toney that shows up....

    James Toney is either one of the best fighters to ever step in the ring or one of the biggest disgraces...It all depends on him...The guy lost to fellows way below his caliber.....It is almost like Toney sometimes just does not care....He is a funny guy that Toney is.....

    BTW when I speak of James Toney I speak of the REAL James Toney not the Heavyweight impersonator....But the Toney from 160-CW
    Oh yes none other Daxx my friend

    James toney for the real boxing fans/historians/ lovers will always be the undefeated p4p great that was the utterly skillful flamboyant puncher/slickster at 160 and 168

    Some count the end of his reign as his first loss to jones, Fair play to Roy jones..But he never finished james, it was a shutout but toney went on to get robbed against griffin in both fights imo especialy number one..

    But on the other hand at a certain point in james' career you have to sometimes think.. Just wouldnt have been james toney had he not carried on in the exact way in which he did

    He still had many entertaining bouts that many people never payed any attention to, and late in his career i still think it was amazing the way he made it all the way back and beat jirov in such an entertaining fight to become cruiserweight champion which i rate just as highly as roy's win over john ruiz

    and his record even to this day is nice to look at, to have had so many fights and so very few losses even alot of those losses arent quite what i would call legit

    He just gives the aura out that he is a throw back of old time fighters , a large record, unpadded a trash talking talk the talk walk the walk kinda guy all the way upto recent years and only recently has he began to truely slip..
    Immortal Technique

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3467
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Magic Man
    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
    Quote Originally Posted by The Magic Man
    That is a thing that truely bewilders and somewhat upsets me

    Many people know, and even question whether joe could take on a james toney at 168 prime for prime..

    And toney was one of the very very best in the division and at middleweight

    And while not many will outright say Joey c beats toney,

    Everyone hear either suspects or knows that toney wont have a mark on the legacy that calzaghe probably will

    Its a funny old game..


    Thats why I said it depends on the version of Toney that shows up....

    James Toney is either one of the best fighters to ever step in the ring or one of the biggest disgraces...It all depends on him...The guy lost to fellows way below his caliber.....It is almost like Toney sometimes just does not care....He is a funny guy that Toney is.....

    BTW when I speak of James Toney I speak of the REAL James Toney not the Heavyweight impersonator....But the Toney from 160-CW
    Oh yes none other Daxx my friend

    James toney for the real boxing fans/historians/ lovers will always be the undefeated p4p great that was the utterly skillful flamboyant puncher/slickster at 160 and 168

    Some count the end of his reign as his first loss to jones, Fair play to Roy jones..But he never finished james, it was a shutout but toney went on to get robbed against griffin in both fights imo especialy number one..

    But on the other hand at a certain point in james' career you have to sometimes think.. Just wouldnt have been james toney had he not carried on in the exact way in which he did

    He still had many entertaining bouts that many people never payed any attention to, and late in his career i still think it was amazing the way he made it all the way back and beat jirov in such an entertaining fight to become cruiserweight champion which i rate just as highly as roy's win over john ruiz

    and his record even to this day is nice to look at, to have had so many fights and so very few losses even alot of those losses arent quite what i would call legit

    He just gives the aura out that he is a throw back of old time fighters , a large record, unpadded a trash talking talk the talk walk the walk kinda guy all the way upto recent years and only recently has he began to truely slip..
    Well put...Toney also would have done much better in the Jones fight had he just fought like Toney instead of spending half the time trying to out do Jones EG- When he insisted of making a fool of himself doing to fighting cock impression because Jones did

    What goes through his mind LOL...

    In truth when you look at the Jones HW win do you think Roy would have even stepped in with Guys like Peter? Yes James lost but hell he was there in it against a much younger much bigger Peter....Something you have to respect.....

    Other then Jones Toney has never been soundly beaten....or out classed..I do hope he stays away now for his own good...

    Then again this is James Toney we are talking about
    Hidden Content IN CASE THEY ALL FORGOT WHAT REAL HEAVYWEIGHT POWER WAS!!!

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    Why is it such a crime to think Joe could beat them i mean it is not that out of the question. Like another example is when i say Holmes could beat Ali and every one gets all upset. Why are people so protective of boxers and think that they are unbeatable every boxer can be defeated so i do not think it is that big of a deal to think Joe can beat Roy and Tony. I mean who did they beat at the weight made them so much more special. Joe has been beating everyone in his divsion for ten years and that is all a fighter could do Bernard went down in weight and Roy went up in weight so that why the fights never happened so that all i have to say i am going with Joe to defeat both and thats all i can say.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Lincoln ENG
    Posts
    6,125
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1284
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
    Quote Originally Posted by The Magic Man
    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn
    Quote Originally Posted by The Magic Man
    That is a thing that truely bewilders and somewhat upsets me

    Many people know, and even question whether joe could take on a james toney at 168 prime for prime..

    And toney was one of the very very best in the division and at middleweight

    And while not many will outright say Joey c beats toney,

    Everyone hear either suspects or knows that toney wont have a mark on the legacy that calzaghe probably will

    Its a funny old game..


    Thats why I said it depends on the version of Toney that shows up....

    James Toney is either one of the best fighters to ever step in the ring or one of the biggest disgraces...It all depends on him...The guy lost to fellows way below his caliber.....It is almost like Toney sometimes just does not care....He is a funny guy that Toney is.....

    BTW when I speak of James Toney I speak of the REAL James Toney not the Heavyweight impersonator....But the Toney from 160-CW
    Oh yes none other Daxx my friend

    James toney for the real boxing fans/historians/ lovers will always be the undefeated p4p great that was the utterly skillful flamboyant puncher/slickster at 160 and 168

    Some count the end of his reign as his first loss to jones, Fair play to Roy jones..But he never finished james, it was a shutout but toney went on to get robbed against griffin in both fights imo especialy number one..

    But on the other hand at a certain point in james' career you have to sometimes think.. Just wouldnt have been james toney had he not carried on in the exact way in which he did

    He still had many entertaining bouts that many people never payed any attention to, and late in his career i still think it was amazing the way he made it all the way back and beat jirov in such an entertaining fight to become cruiserweight champion which i rate just as highly as roy's win over john ruiz

    and his record even to this day is nice to look at, to have had so many fights and so very few losses even alot of those losses arent quite what i would call legit

    He just gives the aura out that he is a throw back of old time fighters , a large record, unpadded a trash talking talk the talk walk the walk kinda guy all the way upto recent years and only recently has he began to truely slip..
    Well put...Toney also would have done much better in the Jones fight had he just fought like Toney instead of spending half the time trying to out do Jones EG- When he insisted of making a fool of himself doing to fighting cock impression because Jones did

    What goes through his mind LOL...

    In truth when you look at the Jones HW win do you think Roy would have even stepped in with Guys like Peter? Yes James lost but hell he was there in it against a much younger much bigger Peter....Something you have to respect.....

    Other then Jones Toney has never been soundly beaten....or out classed..I do hope he stays away now for his own good...

    Then again this is James Toney we are talking about
    There are many words for james toney

    One of them is definately PROUD

    Lol

    He has one of the most amazing chins.. I think the most amazing and ironic thing i feel about this era of boxing is this..

    Of the entire era maybe the last twenty years you can say that there are two people who stand out as utter defensive greats.. Bernard Hopkins, and an in shape James Toney
    And ironicly both have some of the best chins ive ever seen in boxing
    Immortal Technique

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,692
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3467
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140
    Why is it such a crime to think Joe could beat them i mean it is not that out of the question. Like another example is when i say Holmes could beat Ali and every one gets all upset. Why are people so protective of boxers and think that they are unbeatable every boxer can be defeated so i do not think it is that big of a deal to think Joe can beat Roy and Tony. I mean who did they beat at the weight made them so much more special. Joe has been beating everyone in his divsion for ten years and that is all a fighter could do Bernard went down in weight and Roy went up in weight so that why the fights never happened so that all i have to say i am going with Joe to defeat both and thats all i can say.

    The fact you even ask why Jones and Toney were so great at those weights is a hint you may not know exactly what you are talking about in terms of skill and how it is measured...Look at them in their bouts at 160 and 168....I mean actually watch them in full then if at then end you are stiill saying you do not see what is so special about them at those weight classes....

    Tune into the world Curling Championships....
    Hidden Content IN CASE THEY ALL FORGOT WHAT REAL HEAVYWEIGHT POWER WAS!!!

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    Khan i did not say there were not special but i think Joe could have a shot to beat them and if you disagree o well.

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Down In The Valley
    Posts
    2,930
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1456
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    Quote Originally Posted by Saddo
    Why aint i suprised at this thread
    The only thing that changes, is the names.
    Hidden Content Boot Hill, Where the Real Fights Are Fought.

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    And Roy and Tony were in different weight classes for most of there careers just depends on how you look at who they beat and when they did it and what weight class they were at. Do i think Joe could go up as much weight as Roy and Tony did and still win i am not sure if he could. But at SM i think Joe has a good shot to win and do not think i am putting Roy and Tony down i am not Khan just talking about if they fought Joe what i think would happen thats it. So just thought i clear up anything you might of misunderstood what i was trying to say.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5023
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    To question RJJ & Toneys greatness at their respective divisions is absurd.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2540
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    We all expected threads like this if Joe won. Don't rise to it I say

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    Look i am not question there greatness Cut all i am saying is what i think would happen if they fought Joe at SM.

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    In my own little Universe
    Posts
    10,052
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2261
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    Hmmn ...... undisputed world supermiddleweight champion, the Ring supermiddleweight champion, the absolute consummate pro, 4 belts in his house now, 40-something consecutive professional wins, 17 years undefeated, 21 successful 'world' title defences including all mandatories.

    ..... and he 'still aint that good'?


    If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1112
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    Maybe if he moves up to Heavyweight and beats Wlad people just might consider him good i guess.

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2540
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: To me Calzaghe still ain't that good.

    Quote Originally Posted by X
    Hmmn ...... undisputed world supermiddleweight champion, the Ring supermiddleweight champion, the absolute consummate pro, 4 belts in his house now, 40-something consecutive professional wins, 17 years undefeated, 21 successful 'world' title defences including all mandatories.

    ..... and he 'still aint that good'?


    Ain't it just totally fucking crazy?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing