Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 108

Thread: Robbery [spoilers]

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    804
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Robbery [spoilers]

    Quote Originally Posted by the wiz View Post
    I disagree I had it 117-111 for Pavlik. I had Jermain winning the 2, 9, 10 rounds. I just thought that Pavlik did more throughout the whole fight. Taylor would land a few here and there. Pavlik was just consistant enough throughout each round.

    If u had it 117-111 then your hi along with that judge. This was a robbery.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    804
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Robbery [spoilers]

    Compubox was off.. and this was politics. Jermain won this fight 116-112.

  3. #3
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Robbery [spoilers]

    Quote Originally Posted by BigLuke View Post
    Compubox was off.. and this was politics. Jermain won this fight 116-112.
    How can Compubox be off ?? ok i will admit it isn't 100 percent accurate, but it isn't that far off, Pavlik outworked Taylor and won end of, he landed more power shots and overall punches, saying Compubox is off to prove a point Taylor won is silly logic.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    2,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1950
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Robbery [spoilers]

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    How can Compubox be off ?? ok i will admit it isn't 100 percent accurate, but it isn't that far off, Pavlik outworked Taylor and won end of, he landed more power shots and overall punches, saying Compubox is off to prove a point Taylor won is silly logic.
    I wonder how all the people who scored this fight for Taylor scored Taylor/Hopkins 1 for Hopkins. In that fight, it was JT that let his hands go while Hopkins landed cleaner more effective blows. IMHO, Hopkins did that to Taylor to a much larger degree than Taylor did it to Pavlik.

  5. #5
    SigmaMu Guest

    Default Re: Robbery [spoilers]

    I saw Taylor with a giant black eye. That was not a mouse on his face it was a rat.

    I will have to watch the fight again once I download and convert to DVD but it was a pretty boring fight. This was nothing more than a high payed sparring session for Kelly. I wonder how much Lou DiBully paid Pavlik not to destroy his boy and allow him to go the distance.

    Pavlik still wins.

    Taylor will become marketable again but at what weight class?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    572
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1004
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Robbery [spoilers]

    Quote Originally Posted by BigLuke View Post
    If u had it 117-111 then your hi along with that judge. This was a robbery.

    Haha, I'm high? You can't even use you're correctly. But in all seriousness how does everyone thing 116-112 isn't out of the question but 117-111 is? It's only a round difference.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    804
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Robbery [spoilers]

    Quote Originally Posted by the wiz View Post
    Haha, I'm high? You can't even use you're correctly. But in all seriousness how does everyone thing 116-112 isn't out of the question but 117-111 is? It's only a round difference.

    Dude.... were talking boxing... on a forum... dont correct my usage of your and yes i'll misuse it again cuz i really dont give a freakin crap.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    572
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1004
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Robbery [spoilers]

    Quote Originally Posted by BigLuke View Post
    Dude.... were talking boxing... on a forum... dont correct my usage of your and yes i'll misuse it again cuz i really dont give a freakin crap.

    LOL It was a response to you stating I was high. Jack ass

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,679
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2360
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Robbery [spoilers]

    I felt it was 115-113 for Pavlik. Jermaine was being outworked by Pavlik towards the end. Taylor did land the more meaningful punches throughout the fight but Pavlik kept throwing and landing more in the end.

    I had Taylor way in the lead in the beginning and the gap somewhat closing in the middle rounds and Pavlik taking the end of the fight. I guess finishing strong is more important than starting out strong.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Posts
    2,658
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1503
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Robbery [spoilers]

    I scored it 115-113 to Pavlik.

    Had it 3-3 after 6 but I thought Kelly won 4 of the last 6 to take out the decision. He definitely had Taylor hanging on in the last couple.

    But credit to Taylor for going back to the drawing board and coming up with a good plan. Both guys fought well tonight and should be proud of their efforts.

    Far more shocking was the judge who scored the Mijares fight 120-108 for Navarro...

    Seriously, could it be possible that the judge didn't know which guy was which? This is boxing after all...

    Either that or he was paid off and was just too stupid to even bother to make his card look believable - the muppet just thought 'oh well, this guy has got to win so I'm giving him every round'

    That guy should never be allowed to attend any fights in the future, let alone judge one...
    "I take good care of my people. I like to inflict permanent psychological damage."

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,081
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1104
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Robbery [spoilers]

    I am very upset at this decision. It makes me dislike Pavlik personally, even though he didn't do anything wrong. From now on I will probably root against Pavlik no matter who he fights. Which is too bad, because he comes across as a fairly humble and down to earth person.

    I don't want to watch this fight again because I know I will see it the same way. I thought Taylor fought excellent tonight, in fact I've never seen him fight a more controlled fight. His jab was beautiful, he was confident, precise, kept his hands low and still managed to slip punches with ease.

    With how confident he looked in the ring tonight I would have never guessed he was fighting a guy who KO'd him the previous fight. The decision tonight is very disappointing, as this would have made a fantastic trilogy. I am very disappointed in the scoring.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    804
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Robbery [spoilers]

    Quote Originally Posted by the wiz View Post
    LOL It was a response to you stating I was high. Jack ass
    Look i was tryin not to insult your intelligence... at least if you were high you would have an exscuse.. but i guess that just makes you a moron then.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1177
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Robbery [spoilers]

    This fight didn't even come close to a robbery, I must have been watching a different fight than half the people were if this qualifies as a robbery. Kelly consistently outlanded taylor, I didn't really see taylor landing the more significant shots there were no shots in there where you thought kelly is going down, where as taylor in the 11th was dam close to hitting the deck I think. 117-111 is a bit wide, but 116-112 or 115-113 pavlik are spot on. Also if kelly missed with half his punches then I guess they were still enough to fuck taylors eye up that bad....Sorry no robbery here, the right man definitely won! If this had been a 15 rounder of old I'm pretty sure taylor would have ended up on the deck. As for the compubox numbers when they're that heavily in favor of the winner and all the judges had it for the same guy there really is not much chance of there trullu being a robbery, instead people might be projecting their own perceptions onto something that really isn't there.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Was this really a robbery?
    By Kev in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-20-2007, 11:47 PM
  2. Yet Another Robbery In Boxing
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-13-2007, 02:21 AM
  3. ****Lidell vs Ortiz *****SPOILERS!!! SPOILERS!!!****
    By CutMeMick in forum Mixed Martial Arts
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 01-06-2007, 01:18 AM
  4. Replies: 26
    Last Post: 12-23-2006, 05:28 AM
  5. HIGHWAY ROBBERY!!!!!
    By NorthSideX4 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-04-2006, 09:06 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing