Just Comeback And Watched Taylor vs Pavlik 2 Why Are People Saying This Was A Robbery

[Baby-Faced-Assassin]

I had taylor ahead until the last 2 rounds which i thought kelly won
so imo it could have gone either way

[ICB]

I had taylor ahead until the last 2 rounds which i thought kelly won
so imo it could have gone either way

I have no problem with your last comment like i said, i can see why people may of thought Taylor nicked it, but what really annoys me is when people call this fight a robbery, when it shouldn't be labelled as that.

[Baby-Faced-Assassin]

i agree it couldnt be called a robbery

[Pugilistic]

it was not a robbery, it was a close fight that i gave to pavlik 115-113

[El Kabong]

Well I am very pleased with the results of this fight...everyone ends up looking good. Pavlik remains champion and undefeated, Taylor is brave for taking an immediate rematch and looked like a new man he boxed well and used his jab and didn't fade too bad over the championship rounds (even though those rounds eventually cost him the fight).

I think Taylor should go ahead and take a tune up fight at 168 vs someone like Jaidon Codrington or Peter Manfredo Jr. and then move on to bigger fights vs: Jeff Lacy, Edison Miranda, and Allan Green.

Meanwhile Pavlik should take a fight vs Duddy or even Sergio Mora (please please please I want to see him destroyed!!!) and then maybe take on a big name fighter like Abraham or even Winky Wright.

[GAME]

Whos calling this a robbery ?

It was onesided cuz Taylor was afraid to get knocked out again so he didnt try to throw enough punches .

[The Rela]

not sure why people are calling it a robbery?

It was a close fight and 115-113 was how I saw it.

Good fight though, I could have watched a few more rounds of it.