Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

View Poll Results: Who wins and how in the Cruiserweight Unification?

Voters
54. This poll is closed
  • David Haye KO

    37 68.52%
  • David Haye UD

    1 1.85%
  • Draw

    0 0%
  • Enzo Maccarinelli UD

    3 5.56%
  • Enzo Maccarinelli KO

    13 24.07%
Results 1 to 15 of 251

Thread: David Haye v Enzo Maccarinelli - Cruiserweight Title Unification RBR

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    716
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1229
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye v Enzo Maccarinelli - Cruiserweight Title Unification RBR - LIVE NOW

    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    I completely disagree, IMO Haye is going to storm the heavywights and remember Haye is a NATURAL heavyweight so he will be hitting harder than he hit Enzo last night and Sam Peter, Wlad Klitchsko... will not be able to cope with his power at all.
    Just curious why you consider Haye a NATURAL heavyweight? He has fight his whole career - bar one fight - at Cruiserweight, and he didn't exactly come off too weight drained to me yesterday either.

    Wlad, Peter or Valuev are natural heavyweights - and by no means could they be fighting at other weights. Haye's best weight is probably somewhere between 200 and 210, and while he might have to lose weight to make it, he obviously has the choice of fighting at cruiserweight.

    And the fact that he needs to lose weight is not different from most boxers - hell even Hatton has to train to make 140, but we aren't exactly calling him a natural welterweight are we? This is not to say that Haye will not fare well - or be a better fighter for that matter - at HV...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Liverpool, UK
    Posts
    6,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye v Enzo Maccarinelli - Cruiserweight Title Unification RBR - LIVE NOW

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikkel_K View Post
    Just curious why you consider Haye a NATURAL heavyweight? He has fight his whole career - bar one fight - at Cruiserweight, and he didn't exactly come off too weight drained to me yesterday either.

    Wlad, Peter or Valuev are natural heavyweights - and by no means could they be fighting at other weights. Haye's best weight is probably somewhere between 200 and 210, and while he might have to lose weight to make it, he obviously has the choice of fighting at cruiserweight.

    And the fact that he needs to lose weight is not different from most boxers - hell even Hatton has to train to make 140, but we aren't exactly calling him a natural welterweight are we? This is not to say that Haye will not fare well - or be a better fighter for that matter - at HV...
    Haye was the one who said he was a natural heavyweight, I never came to that assumption it's a fact.

    Once he moves to heavy he won't be able to make cruiser again, another FACT by what his trainer Adam Booth said.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5032
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye v Enzo Maccarinelli - Cruiserweight Title Unification RBR

    GO ON! DAY-VED!


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5032
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye v Enzo Maccarinelli - Cruiserweight Title Unification RBR - LIVE NOW

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikkel_K View Post
    Just curious why you consider Haye a NATURAL heavyweight? He has fight his whole career - bar one fight - at Cruiserweight, and he didn't exactly come off too weight drained to me yesterday either.
    Someone correct me if I'm wrong but didn't he fight as a HW in the ams?
    So in part yes he is considered at natureal HW.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    716
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1229
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye v Enzo Maccarinelli - Cruiserweight Title Unification RBR - LIVE NOW

    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    Someone correct me if I'm wrong but didn't he fight as a HW in the ams?
    So in part yes he is considered at natureal HW.
    Well, he won a Heavyweight silver medal at the amateur world championship at least (lost to Odlanier Solis in the final - good fight people should see it), and I guess most of his then opponents have fought their pro career at heavyweight. Sultan Ibragimov won the bronze medal at the same weight, same championships for example.

    However, you should remember that he weight limit there is 91 kilo, which roughly equals 200 pounds. Which in the pro-ranks is the Cruiser-limit of course. The amatuers have Super-Heavyweight above that weight, the pro's have Heavyweight.

    Also, if Haye should have fought one weight below, he should be under something like 178 pounds. No way he cold ever do that (at least not now).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    1,977
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1424
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye v Enzo Maccarinelli - Cruiserweight Title Unification RBR

    As a guy who picked (and bet on ) Enzo just want to give my probs to Haye. He did what he said he would.

    Enzo fought frightened IMO, he was fidgety to every faint Haye made and was way too respectful of his power, which caused him to do the last thing he should do against a hitter and stand in front of him doing nothing.

    Don't want to take anything away from Haye though, even if Enzo had employed a better strategy it would have only delayed the inevitable (as well as give the fans a bit more entertainment), even in the little we saw his composure and timing was very impressive. As for heavyweight, I still think Fragomeni layed the blueprint to beat him, a guy who can take his blows and keep on coming will be able to beat him, as well as the obvious guys with montrous power themselves and the reach to deliver it (Wlad). But Haye certainly has the skills to beat many of them, and in entertaining fashion.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3133
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye v Enzo Maccarinelli - Cruiserweight Title Unification RBR

    Quote Originally Posted by Bomp View Post
    As a guy who picked (and bet on ) Enzo just want to give my probs to Haye. He did what he said he would.

    Enzo fought frightened IMO, he was fidgety to every faint Haye made and was way too respectful of his power, which caused him to do the last thing he should do against a hitter and stand in front of him doing nothing.

    Don't want to take anything away from Haye though, even if Enzo had employed a better strategy it would have only delayed the inevitable (as well as give the fans a bit more entertainment), even in the little we saw his composure and timing was very impressive. As for heavyweight, I still think Fragomeni layed the blueprint to beat him, a guy who can take his blows and keep on coming will be able to beat him, as well as the obvious guys with montrous power themselves and the reach to deliver it (Wlad). But Haye certainly has the skills to beat many of them, and in entertaining fashion.
    Unlucky Bomp

    I said it was a crazy fight to bet on.. although I meant crazy to bet on Enzo.. personally I cleaned up on the Haye KO rds 1-3
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    1,977
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1424
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye v Enzo Maccarinelli - Cruiserweight Title Unification RBR

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Unlucky Bomp

    I said it was a crazy fight to bet on.. although I meant crazy to bet on Enzo.. personally I cleaned up on the Haye KO rds 1-3
    Hindsights a beautiful thing, I only lost 6 quid anyway, I'm a bit of a sissy better, but they were very good odds, now I know why.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    in a house
    Posts
    4,863
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1218
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: David Haye v Enzo Maccarinelli - Cruiserweight Title Unification RBR

    Did any of you see Joe Calzaghe's face when Enzo was in corner as ref waved it off.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 88
    Last Post: 03-11-2008, 07:43 PM
  2. David Haye vs. Enzo Maccarinelli (youtube link)
    By Swice in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-09-2008, 10:15 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-30-2007, 08:49 PM
  4. Enzo Maccarinelli V David Haye
    By taansend in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 08-18-2007, 01:28 PM
  5. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06-07-2007, 07:29 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing