The Finalised Saddoboxing Pound for Pound Top Ten

[CutMeMick]

The only serious issue I have with that list Pavlik so high up.

I can live with the rest of it.

[Violent Demise]

Hatton has no business being on a p4p list. All fighters listed on the p4p list that are coming of losses (Marquez and Wright) were at least competitive in there fights. Hatton was blown out in his fight. It wasn't competitive. He should be removed. And he should be removed now.

[donnydarkoIRL]

I can live with that list!

But essentially it's a top 11. If it's the top 10 then Hatton misses out!

Well the one issue I came up with was that Miguel Cotto and Juan Manuel Marquez camwe up with not only an equal quantity of votes, but also an equal quantity of votes. Lets say 10 people voted for Juan Manuel, ten for Cotto. Of Juan's ten 5 had him at number 4, 5 had him at number 5. Of Miguels ten, 5 had him at 4, 5 had him at no.5!!! A dead heat!!! Neitrher was viewed to be above or below the other!

May I know Donny if you have done it scientifically? What is the population of Saddoboxing? How did you compute for the representative size of the population (in case, you don't want to include inactive members)? How many voted and what is the percentage of those who voted compared to the population?

It's called the technique of sampling. You may have underwent such research prior to your doctrate? When sampling a country, obviously the entire nation can't feasibly be asked to participate so we take a sample. I acquired 20 votes. Of these Mayweather topped the list in 19 surveys, as he missed out on one list completely(!) He was added an eleven to bring him up to par. The position of the fighter on the list was used as their points. If the fighter only received one vote of 5 he had 19 * 11's aded to that to bring him up to standard. This was then compiled in a points system, allowing all fighters mentioned a spot, but only the lowest scoring makingh it on the list and ranked accordingly.

The only serious issue I have with that list Pavlik so high up.

I can live with the rest of it.

I thought that myself at first. Pavlik was left off many lists, but the lists he did appear on reflected on him quite favourably and resulted in him making it quite high on the list.

Hatton has no business being on a p4p list. All fighters listed on the p4p list that are coming of losses (Marquez and Wright) were at least competitive in there fights. Hatton was blown out in his fight. It wasn't competitive. He should be removed. And he should be removed now.

As I mentioned this list, isn't my personal list, it's not Saddo's personal list, nor is it anyone's personal list. This list is a compilation of the Saddo's list and this is what all o us have voted.

[leftylee]

Hatton has no business being on a p4p list. All fighters listed on the p4p list that are coming of losses (Marquez and Wright) were at least competitive in there fights. Hatton was blown out in his fight. It wasn't competitive. He should be removed. And he should be removed now.

What a surprise VD said that.

[El Gamo]

I agree with VD,not just for Hatton's recent loss but his run of fights before that was NOT p4p. Him being on the list just shows that there are alot of Hatton fans here who let their bias take control. How can Ricky Hatton be on that list and Ivan Calderon,2 weight,unbeatemtons of defences and faced lots of top fighters NOT be on that list.

[donnydarkoIRL]

I agree with VD,not just for Hatton's recent loss but his run of fights before that was NOT p4p. Him being on the list just shows that there are alot of Hatton fans here who let their bias take control. How can Ricky Hatton be on that list and Ivan Calderon,2 weight,unbeatemtons of defences and faced lots of top fighters NOT be on that list.

Because he received one vote from the twenty surveyed.

Hatton received recognition Caledron didn't.
The list is a representation of Saddo's as an entirity. The only way you can alter the list is by attempting to infleunce the participants before the next vote.

[El Gamo]

Wel,,if it was the thread which you made before,I had Calderon in my list and I'm sure I saw Ivan in another list too.

[donnydarkoIRL]

Wel,,if it was the thread which you made before,I had Calderon in my list and I'm sure I saw Ivan in another list too.

Yes Caledron made 4 out of twenty lists in the lower half of three of four lists.
So he appears in 20% of lists, 75% had him in the lower half of their list.
Going forward this left him with a 22.5% chance of making any list.
Thats before you consider that other fighters are being considered for the list.
Factor in the fact that other fighters made nearly every list and scored quite highly on each list, means that the general comnsensus was that they deserved their place more than Caledron.

[ICB]

Wel,,if it was the thread which you made before,I had Calderon in my list and I'm sure I saw Ivan in another list too.

I had Calderon in my list as well.

[Violent Demise]

Because he received one vote from the twenty surveyed.

Hatton received recognition Caledron didn't.
The list is a representation of Saddo's as an entirity. The only way you can alter the list is by attempting to infleunce the participants before the next vote.

Anybody that has Hatton on the there p4p list doesn't know boxing. He should be removed. Your calling this list "The Finalized Saddoboxing Pound for Pound Top Ten". Guests and people from other forums are going to look at that and think "damn them posters at Saddo don't know shit. They got Hatton on a p4p list." Your making the forum look bad.

[Galaxy]

Anybody that has Hatton on the there p4p list doesn't know boxing. He should be removed. Your calling this list "The Finalized Saddoboxing Pound for Pound Top Ten". Guests and people from other forums are going to look at that and think "damn them posters at Saddo don't know shit. They got Hatton on a p4p list." Your making the forum look bad.

I love the way you say doesn't know boxing... what just because they have a different opinion to you, now what they don't know anything? I have Hatton on my P4P he beat Tszyu who was ranked #4 by Ring mag at the time & his only lose is to the best fighter in the world currently!

[donnydarkoIRL]

Anybody that has Hatton on the there p4p list doesn't know boxing. He should be removed. Your calling this list "The Finalized Saddoboxing Pound for Pound Top Ten". Guests and people from other forums are going to look at that and think "damn them posters at Saddo don't know shit. They got Hatton on a p4p list." Your making the forum look bad.

I man't doing Fuck all apart from displaying what Saddo's members voted.
As I said before it's a presentation of what all the guys voted so if you feel strongly enough about it make a thread, promoting guys that you feel should be on the list convince everybody who the best fighters were.

The above list is factual, it's an actual representation of the opinions here. You lobby for your fighters to get on the list and in one month I'll do the same test.

[Violent Demise]

I agree with VD,not just for Hatton's recent loss but his run of fights before that was NOT p4p. Him being on the list just shows that there are alot of Hatton fans here who let their bias take control. How can Ricky Hatton be on that list and Ivan Calderon,2 weight,unbeatemtons of defences and faced lots of top fighters NOT be on that list.

That's cuz your like me. You have great boxing knowledge. And you appreciate all weight divisions.