belts don't mean shyt, the juan p4p myth is a good example. thank you campbell for exposing the truth. if thats so then is campbell top p4p all of sudden? HELL NO!
belts don't mean shyt, the juan p4p myth is a good example. thank you campbell for exposing the truth. if thats so then is campbell top p4p all of sudden? HELL NO!
You read my post right?
Diaz wasnt p4p for the belts alone. He was the most consistant impressive and winning lightweight for a time, and the belts were just icing on the cake. HE earned his p4p by dominating the champs in his division and being the most consistant. I only ranked casamayor above him in p4p but after casa's last performance i'd still have cas over him but not by much in terms of accomplishment.
Point is Diaz was dominating the lightweight division and like it or not next to casa was the best in it.
Honestly I didn't bother to read your whole post. Well yea juan dominate guys he beat. But he only dominated against jolio and freitas in the later rounds. It was a pretty close battle til the later rounds when juan had taken his oppenents spirit. He wasn't dominant for the whole fight, he was just the men standing by the end. So now that campbell has dominated him, where does campbell stand? he has the belt and he dominated juan.
Campbell is good but i wouldnt place him p4p until he goes on the kind of streak diaz did you also remember diaz is only like 24 years old and thats a lot to accomplish even at his age we havent even probably seen this kids prime yet! So why people are counting him out so early after all he's done so far is astonishing to me.
So if Pac takes away JMM's belt today you won't mention that he is the ""New Champion"" ?
Yeah right ... Think Pac is plastered everywhere just imagine when he has the belt. Also as much of a draw that he is, the going rate will go up for his fights. So how is it that belts mean nothing ? They mean nothing to boxers with no personality or character. To those who do it is a pipeline to riches.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks