crit·ic![]()
(krĭt'ĭk)
n.
One who forms and expresses judgments of the merits, faults, value, or truth of a matter.
I think you're using the wrong word here my friend.. This site is full of boxing CRITICS.. being a 'critic' does not mean that you only point out negative things about the subject matter.. it is just analyzing the reality of a situation..
Kirkland Laing (the poster ) said it best.. "He would have had trouble finding work as a sparring partner in the 1970s. His last fight was a disgrace."
If you think that Klitschko shouldn't have KO'd Ibragimov, then you are in denial.. Even his TRAINER told him if he didn't KO him it was bad.. It wasn't because he couldn't hit him, it was because he was afraid of the southpaw's counterpunch, he said it HIMSELF in the interview.. He played it safe, and won, yes, props to him, but the fact that he knocked Ibragimov's ass into the ropes (which could've been scored a knockdown) while spending barely any effort, the fact is that the fight should've ended in a KO.. Now if it was floyd mayweather, the p4p king we're talking about, and he wins a UD, then that's his style and no one can knock him for that.. but the "undisputed" HW Champ, who is a fucking GIANT, being afraid of a counter puncher? Give me a break.. unless the guy was Mike Tyson, if you're that big you shouldn't be afraid to knock the guys lights out.. end of story.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 



Reply With Quote
Bookmarks