Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Is the linear championship as prestigious as the alphabets?

Results 1 to 15 of 47

Thread: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    721
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by miron_lang View Post
    Is Linear Championship as prestigious as the alphabets?

    -I cant edit the title

    Cassamayor is the linear lightweight champion but Nate Campbel after conqering Juan Diaz has the Belts.


    So do you think that the Linear Championships is as Prestigious as the WBC, WBA and IBF?
    Of course it is LENNOX LEWIS is still the Linear heavyweight champ.

    Because From when Patterson beat Moore the true champ is the man who beat the man.

    The reason LENNOX LEWIS boxed Shannon Briggs was not because Briggs held the WBU title. It was because by beating Foreman Briggs was the linear champ.

    And no matter how little anyone rates Briggs in the history of boxing for a very short time he held the legitimate heavyweight championship of the world.

  2. #2
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    Of course it is LENNOX LEWIS is still the Linear heavyweight champ.

    Because From when Patterson beat Moore the true champ is the man who beat the man.

    The reason LENNOX LEWIS boxed Shannon Briggs was not because Briggs held the WBU title. It was because by beating Foreman Briggs was the linear champ.

    And no matter how little anyone rates Briggs in the history of boxing for a very short time he held the legitimate heavyweight championship of the world.
    The problem is Seanie he didn't beat Foreman, Foreman was robbed and Foreman was what 47 year's old ??

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1009
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Well when it comes to the Lineal Title you have to go to the old motto that sais the title does not make the champion but the champion makes the title.

    The best example of this is when Roy Jones ruled the 175lb division he was never the linear champion. But he was without a doubt THE MAN at that division.

    So the answer is: It depends on who is the linear champion.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    721
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan View Post
    Well when it comes to the Lineal Title you have to go to the old motto that sais the title does not make the champion but the champion makes the title.

    The best example of this is when Roy Jones ruled the 175lb division he was never the linear champion. But he was without a doubt THE MAN at that division.

    So the answer is: It depends on who is the linear champion.

    What a crock of dogs pooh.

    Jones inherited Michazelski titles.

    He was scared to box outside America.

    Michazelski has more claim to being the linear champ than Jones ever had.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1432
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    What a crock of dogs pooh.

    Jones inherited Michazelski titles.

    He was scared to box outside America.

    Michazelski has more claim to being the linear champ than Jones ever had.
    Hmmmm

    Are you sure?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1009
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    What a crock of dogs pooh.

    Jones inherited Michazelski titles.

    He was scared to box outside America.

    Michazelski has more claim to being the linear champ than Jones ever had.

    Explain to me which part of my post is a crock of dogs pooh....

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    721
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan View Post
    Explain to me which part of my post is a crock of dogs pooh....


    Jones won titles Michazkeski was forced to give up.

    He refused to box Michazlski cos he was scared.

    You saying Jones deserves to be liner champ is a massive crock of dogs pooh.

    He doesnt deserve it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1009
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    Jones won titles Michazkeski was forced to give up.

    He refused to box Michazlski cos he was scared.

    You saying Jones deserves to be liner champ is a massive crock of dogs pooh.

    He doesnt deserve it.

    Ummm... NO I never said that. I said that he was not the Linear Champion. IMO he should not be considered the linear champion because he never beat Darious who was deservatly so, the the linear champion.

    All I'm saying is that in that case the belts held more weight than the linear title. I respect Darious but I think it is safe to say that Jones was the #1 175lber of his time.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2308
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    What a crock of dogs pooh.

    Jones inherited Michazelski titles.

    He was scared to box outside America.

    Michazelski has more claim to being the linear champ than Jones ever had.
    Incorrect
    091

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1316
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    The Ring Magazine belts are the ONLY ones that matter.

    I couldn't even tell you who owns the WBC, WBA, IBF in any of the divisions, because they're completely worthless.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    67,074
    Mentioned
    1706 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3145
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Ricky Hatton may not hold any major title but he is considered the true champion at light welterweight.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2344
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea View Post
    The Ring Magazine belts are the ONLY ones that matter.

    I couldn't even tell you who owns the WBC, WBA, IBF in any of the divisions, because they're completely worthless.
    I'm with you bro, the alphabets don't exist to me!

    As for Jones/ Dariusz me & Mick had a long debate awhile back. Mick said cause Hill & Maske fought that created a linear champ but I disagreed because Jones had fought in the division before that fight occurred so Hill & Maske weren't the 2 best fighters in the division. From there Jones put all 3 belts together something Dariusz didn't (even if he was stripped unfairly he didn't get Jones part) so in my eyes Jones has more claim to the LH linear title than Dariusz.
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    721
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    The problem is Seanie he didn't beat Foreman, Foreman was robbed and Foreman was what 47 year's old ??

    The record books says Briggs won and so did the judges.

  14. #14
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    The record books says Briggs won and so did the judges.
    Yea and the record books say Spinks beat Holmes in there 2nd fight but there isn't a single boxing fan i've ever met who thinks Spinks deserved that decision. If you honestly think Briggs was a legit Linear champion then you are dreaming. Foreman was 47 years old for crying out loud and it was a damn right highway robbery, there was even an investigation because it was such a bad decision.

    And as for Jones vs Dariusz statement get real, Jones record at LHW was much better than Dariusz's. Plus lets not forget Jones offered Dariusz a fight in USA and Dariusz denied it. But Jones didn't want to go to Germany so it works both ways. And lets not forget Dariusz struggled with the likes of Richard Hall who Jones toyed with. And plus lets not forget Julio Cesar Gonzalez gave Dariusz his first loss and totally out boxed him. Another fighter Jones toyed with and floored Gonzalez 3 times.

    Jones best Wins at LHW

    Montel Griffin
    Mike McCallum
    Virgil Hill
    Julio Cesar Gonzalez
    Eric Harding
    Reggie Johnson
    Clinton Woods

    Dariusz's best Wins at LHW

    Virgil Hill
    Montel Griffin
    Graciano Rocchigiani x2


    Who's record looks better now ??
    Last edited by ICB; 03-13-2008 at 04:06 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. National Championship Game
    By OumaFan in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-08-2008, 06:27 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-07-2007, 02:09 PM
  3. Midget Breakdancing Championship!!!
    By CountryBoy in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-01-2007, 07:34 PM
  4. Tribute to the linear heavyweight champs
    By The Rookie Fan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 03-21-2007, 04:38 AM
  5. The Heavyweight Championship....
    By DaxxKahn in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-14-2007, 08:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing