Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Is the linear championship as prestigious as the alphabets?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 47

Thread: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    986
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Well when it comes to the Lineal Title you have to go to the old motto that sais the title does not make the champion but the champion makes the title.

    The best example of this is when Roy Jones ruled the 175lb division he was never the linear champion. But he was without a doubt THE MAN at that division.

    So the answer is: It depends on who is the linear champion.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    721
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan View Post
    Well when it comes to the Lineal Title you have to go to the old motto that sais the title does not make the champion but the champion makes the title.

    The best example of this is when Roy Jones ruled the 175lb division he was never the linear champion. But he was without a doubt THE MAN at that division.

    So the answer is: It depends on who is the linear champion.

    What a crock of dogs pooh.

    Jones inherited Michazelski titles.

    He was scared to box outside America.

    Michazelski has more claim to being the linear champ than Jones ever had.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,466
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1410
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    What a crock of dogs pooh.

    Jones inherited Michazelski titles.

    He was scared to box outside America.

    Michazelski has more claim to being the linear champ than Jones ever had.
    Hmmmm

    Are you sure?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    986
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    What a crock of dogs pooh.

    Jones inherited Michazelski titles.

    He was scared to box outside America.

    Michazelski has more claim to being the linear champ than Jones ever had.

    Explain to me which part of my post is a crock of dogs pooh....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    721
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan View Post
    Explain to me which part of my post is a crock of dogs pooh....


    Jones won titles Michazkeski was forced to give up.

    He refused to box Michazlski cos he was scared.

    You saying Jones deserves to be liner champ is a massive crock of dogs pooh.

    He doesnt deserve it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    986
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    Jones won titles Michazkeski was forced to give up.

    He refused to box Michazlski cos he was scared.

    You saying Jones deserves to be liner champ is a massive crock of dogs pooh.

    He doesnt deserve it.

    Ummm... NO I never said that. I said that he was not the Linear Champion. IMO he should not be considered the linear champion because he never beat Darious who was deservatly so, the the linear champion.

    All I'm saying is that in that case the belts held more weight than the linear title. I respect Darious but I think it is safe to say that Jones was the #1 175lber of his time.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2285
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SEANIE View Post
    What a crock of dogs pooh.

    Jones inherited Michazelski titles.

    He was scared to box outside America.

    Michazelski has more claim to being the linear champ than Jones ever had.
    Incorrect
    091

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1293
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    The Ring Magazine belts are the ONLY ones that matter.

    I couldn't even tell you who owns the WBC, WBA, IBF in any of the divisions, because they're completely worthless.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,510
    Mentioned
    1698 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Ricky Hatton may not hold any major title but he is considered the true champion at light welterweight.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    london, vegas, crete, algarve, milan
    Posts
    6,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1459
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    ring magazine should not be considered an actual championship more an accurate evaluation of divisional rankings.

    Nadal won wimbledon but he is still 2nd in the world
    Italy won the world cup but theyre not number 1 in the fifa rankings

    Rankings are an estimation of who exactly is the best, but a championship it isnt!!
    one dangerous horrible bloke

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1583
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    If the Ring doesn't keep track of who the Real Champions are, then who will?

    The alphabet gangs so regularly strip titles, award titles, and create interim and "regular" titles, that there is no way of telling who the champ of each division is.

    That is where the Ring comes in. All they are really doing is following the lineage of the Championship, but it is rapidly gaining approval from the boxing world which is sick of the corrupt alphabet gangs which have driven the sport into obscurity(in the US)

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    a local pub near you.
    Posts
    7,652
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2852
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Ricky Hatton may not hold any major title but he is considered the true champion at light welterweight.

    and the greatest boxer EVER. Knocked out a prime castillo with the best body shot EVER.
    "If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    285
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1070
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by boozeboxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Ricky Hatton may not hold any major title but he is considered the true champion at light welterweight.

    and the greatest boxer EVER. Knocked out a prime castillo with the best body shot EVER.


    Prime castillo i don't think so mate.. He knocked an old castillo who was battling the weigh-ins than the actual fight.

    anyway, alphabet titles and linear titles as well are fraud sometimes. Take a look at casamayor.. lets be honest here.. isn't that fight with santa cruz he was gifted? How come they award that to el cepillo. it should be vacant until someone else unify the division. back to square 1. Campbell is the front runner in there so does pacman. We already know that casmayor wants no piece of campbell so thats another issue. Legitimate number 1 campbell has the right to fight the champion. But the champion ducks him.. so strip him for not fighting the best around. sad but true. Now that Ring Mag was owned by a promoter (which happen to be the promoter of casamayor)... i doubt if still has the credibility like they used too. so on and on... this is the problem in boxing. alphabet titles if unify is far more credible now than 1 linear Mag award controlled by a certain powerful promoter.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    LEEDS
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1157
    Cool Clicks

    Talking Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    This must have been the quickest poll answer Ive ever given ... linear every day of the week for me ...

    Hidden Content
    A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2321
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Linear Championship as prestigious than the alphabets?

    Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea View Post
    The Ring Magazine belts are the ONLY ones that matter.

    I couldn't even tell you who owns the WBC, WBA, IBF in any of the divisions, because they're completely worthless.
    I'm with you bro, the alphabets don't exist to me!

    As for Jones/ Dariusz me & Mick had a long debate awhile back. Mick said cause Hill & Maske fought that created a linear champ but I disagreed because Jones had fought in the division before that fight occurred so Hill & Maske weren't the 2 best fighters in the division. From there Jones put all 3 belts together something Dariusz didn't (even if he was stripped unfairly he didn't get Jones part) so in my eyes Jones has more claim to the LH linear title than Dariusz.
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. National Championship Game
    By OumaFan in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-08-2008, 06:27 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-07-2007, 02:09 PM
  3. Midget Breakdancing Championship!!!
    By CountryBoy in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-01-2007, 07:34 PM
  4. Tribute to the linear heavyweight champs
    By The Rookie Fan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 03-21-2007, 04:38 AM
  5. The Heavyweight Championship....
    By DaxxKahn in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-14-2007, 08:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing