Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3382
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    I guess because although not the belt holder, he was by far the star, the Ring champ and recognised best fighter in the division as well as a cash cow.

    I actually am in the tiny minority who doesn't really care to see them fight again.

    I think they are both taking years off of each other and want Manny to have a go at conquering 135 before he retires.

    If he fights Marquez again, even if he wins I think he will be effectively done as a fighter.

    Brawlers like Paquaio, like Barrera and Morales before him only have so much in the tank.

    Coralles and Castillo had little left after their brutal first fight, I think it will be the same for Pacquaio if he fights Marquez again.

    As for Marquez, mark my words, if he fights Juan Guzman or mayeb even Edwin Valero next he's getting beat and possibly even knocked out.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1425
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Pac wasn't Ring champion till he won last night Bilbo.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1190
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Tempers flare after Pacquiao-Marquez fight ends in split decision - Los Angeles Times

    Read the last line, Pacquiao stated he will fight Marquez again. I'm sure this will happen within this year. Win or lose I want Manny to fight Marquez again I don't want people saying that the PACMAN is scared of fighting Marquez.
    Regarding Marquez losing to Valero and Joan Guzman, I doubt it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1192
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    They should go at it again, I mean it seems that more than half the people seem to think that marquez won the fight, so a rematch is warranted. As for marquez getting knocked out by valero and guzman can't see it happening, would outbox valero and guzman and jmm would be very intresting but I'd favor jmm. I don't think this fight ruined him at all, one fight usually doesn't do that to ya he's been a very smart boxer throughout his career for the most part thats why he's still able to compete at such a high level at 34, which is almost antiquity for the lower weight classes.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1460
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Pac defeated Marquez twice already. I don't mind seeing Pac beating Marquez for the third time.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,077
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2114
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    So...

    Marquez had to beat Pacquiao twice to keep his belt. I see.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3382
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Pac wasn't Ring champion till he won last night Bilbo.

    Well I liked what I had written, it sounds good so I will pretend I never saw this

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1583
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Pac man has all the bargaining power. That is why Pac got 5 mil to JM's 1.5 mil

    Besides, the neither man was the champ, as the title was vacant until the decisions was read. (not counting alphabet trinkets)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-29-2010, 05:30 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-22-2007, 02:09 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-24-2007, 09:27 PM
  4. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-19-2007, 02:55 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-04-2006, 06:16 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing