Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,077
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2104
    Cool Clicks

    Default Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Something that baffles me is why there was a rematch clause if Marquez beat Pacquiao?

    Marquez was the man with the belt in this fight. Why should Pacquiao get a rematch clause in the contract?

    B.S.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    I guess because although not the belt holder, he was by far the star, the Ring champ and recognised best fighter in the division as well as a cash cow.

    I actually am in the tiny minority who doesn't really care to see them fight again.

    I think they are both taking years off of each other and want Manny to have a go at conquering 135 before he retires.

    If he fights Marquez again, even if he wins I think he will be effectively done as a fighter.

    Brawlers like Paquaio, like Barrera and Morales before him only have so much in the tank.

    Coralles and Castillo had little left after their brutal first fight, I think it will be the same for Pacquaio if he fights Marquez again.

    As for Marquez, mark my words, if he fights Juan Guzman or mayeb even Edwin Valero next he's getting beat and possibly even knocked out.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Pac wasn't Ring champion till he won last night Bilbo.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1180
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Tempers flare after Pacquiao-Marquez fight ends in split decision - Los Angeles Times

    Read the last line, Pacquiao stated he will fight Marquez again. I'm sure this will happen within this year. Win or lose I want Manny to fight Marquez again I don't want people saying that the PACMAN is scared of fighting Marquez.
    Regarding Marquez losing to Valero and Joan Guzman, I doubt it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1182
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    They should go at it again, I mean it seems that more than half the people seem to think that marquez won the fight, so a rematch is warranted. As for marquez getting knocked out by valero and guzman can't see it happening, would outbox valero and guzman and jmm would be very intresting but I'd favor jmm. I don't think this fight ruined him at all, one fight usually doesn't do that to ya he's been a very smart boxer throughout his career for the most part thats why he's still able to compete at such a high level at 34, which is almost antiquity for the lower weight classes.

  6. #6
    Addicted to_boxing Guest

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    yeah that tag is reserved for a belt holding champion. Further proof that rules in boxing are subject to change and the sport is more interested in economics that the integrity of the sport.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1450
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Pac defeated Marquez twice already. I don't mind seeing Pac beating Marquez for the third time.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,077
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2104
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    So...

    Marquez had to beat Pacquiao twice to keep his belt. I see.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3372
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Pac wasn't Ring champion till he won last night Bilbo.

    Well I liked what I had written, it sounds good so I will pretend I never saw this

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1573
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Pac man has all the bargaining power. That is why Pac got 5 mil to JM's 1.5 mil

    Besides, the neither man was the champ, as the title was vacant until the decisions was read. (not counting alphabet trinkets)

  11. #11
    Addicted to_boxing Guest

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Can a forced or mandatory rematch be enforced?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1573
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    If you have a contractual rematch, the is not fulfilled you could sue for breach of contract(in the US), and get monetary damages, but it is unlikely that a court would ever order someone to fight.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5023
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Quote Originally Posted by Addicted to_boxing View Post
    Can a forced or mandatory rematch be enforced?
    That would be up to the WBC.
    But chances are Pacs gonna vacate the title and move up.
    If the WBC does NOT enforce anything he'll move up and keep his 130 belt as a safety net in the event that he would loose. He can move back down and still hold a belt there....

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1450
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Addicted to_boxing View Post
    Can a forced or mandatory rematch be enforced?


    That would be up to the WBC.
    But chances are Pacs gonna vacate the title and move up.
    If the WBC does NOT enforce anything he'll move up and keep his 130 belt as a safety net in the event that he would loose. He can move back down and still hold a belt there....
    Here's Sulaiman's take...
    SULAIMAN HAS NO PROBLEM WITH PACQUIAO'S SPLIT DECISION



    WBC president Don Jose Sulaiman says that while the rematch between Filipino ring idol Manny Pacquiao and Mexico’s Juan Manuel Marquez was a “very close, very competitive, very tough and very rough fight” he had no problem in accepting the judges split decision that enabled Pacquiao to win the WBC super featherweight title on Sunday.


    In an overseas telephone conversation with Viva Sports/Manila Standard from his home in Mexico City, the WBC president said that every time Marquez connected with well-prepared counter-punches “Manny came back because he has the heart of a lion. He pressured Marquez but not in his usual open and frontal way. It was a very intelligent performance by both fighters."r came with a big heart and pressured Marquez but not in the usual open and frontal way.”

    Sulaiman said “to be honest with you the fight was so close that it was very difficult for the judges to score. However, I would say that Pacquiao came back very determined and with a big heart at the end of the fight and that’s how he got what he got.”

    The WBC president a longtime friend of the Philippines said “ we are proud of this championship because Marquez “ made it very difficult for Pacquiao. It was so close and Pacquiao did everything, everything to win the fight. As a boxing man it was so difficult and both men didn’t deserve to lose.”

    Sulaiman said fight fans would have to wait and see what happens next especially since Pacquiao is reportedly committed to move up to lightweight and fight WBC champion David Diaz. However, the WBC president stressed that “one more fight (between Pacquiao and Marquez) is definitely what the people of the world want.”

    Sulaiman conceded it would be “hard to agree” on a third fight even though Golden Boy Promotions CEO Richard Schaefer made a $6 million offer to Top Rank promoter Bob Arum who handles Pacquiao for one more fight. Sulaiman suggested that after one more fight for both Pacquiao and Marquez “there should be a rematch. It would be my recommendation as a boxing fan after listening to people talking that Marquez did not deserve to lose neither did Pacquiao.”

    If there’s any consolation for Marquez it’s the fact that the WBC president assured him he will be ranked No.1 despite the loss because it “will be unfair” if he is not given the recognition after such a close fight. Sulaiman emphasized that “without any question he (Marquez) will fight for the title” which will happen should Pacquiao decide to relinquish the 130 pound crown and remain at 135 pounds.

    Celebrated trainer Freddie Roach in an interview with journalist Dennis Principe on his Sports Talk morning show over dzSR Sports Radio said it was “a very good, very close fight and the knockdown (in round three) was the difference. I thought Manny won the fight by one point. Manny landed the bigger shots and Marquez came back in the middle rounds but in the end of the fight Manny finished well.” Roach noted that HBO panelists Larry Merchant, Jim Lampley and Emmanuel Steward all had Pacquiao the winner as well as several well-known boxing writers on popular boxing internet sites.

    Roach said that when Marquez was dropped in round three “Manny knocked him down so hard I didn’t really think he would get up because of the way he went down. It was a great shot. If Manny jumped on him a little harder we would have had him. Marquez is a very durable guy. He showed a lot of heart to get up like that. In their first fight Marquez went down three times in the first round but in this fight, the way he went down, I thought he was out.”

    Roach agreed with Pacquiao that Marquez fought a better fight in the rematch. Roach noted he was “more aggressive, threw more punches and he made some nice adjustments.”

    Responding to criticism from the Marquez camp about the decision and an apparent division even among Filipinos, Roach said “let’s not talk about bad decisions. Talk about what a great fight it was. Either boy could have won the fight . If we lost by one point I wouldn’t complain. Both fighters wanted it and fights like this are great for boxing.”

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,720
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1115
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac-JMM "Rematch Clause"

    Quote Originally Posted by BoxingGorilla View Post
    Something that baffles me is why there was a rematch clause if Marquez beat Pacquiao?

    Marquez was the man with the belt in this fight. Why should Pacquiao get a rematch clause in the contract?

    B.S.
    if my memory serves me correctly JMM had the belt in the first also.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-29-2010, 05:30 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-22-2007, 02:09 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-24-2007, 09:27 PM
  4. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-19-2007, 02:55 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-04-2006, 06:16 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing