Is there anyone without a padded record?

[Scrap]

I know qf one Kid, had under twenty Amatuer Fights. won the British in his eighth fight and the European in his 15th, not bad.

[donnydarkoIRL]

I know qf one Kid, had under twenty Amatuer Fights. won the British in his eighth fight and the European in his 15th, not bad.

[Scrap]

.

[donnydarkoIRL]

.

Ha...indeed.

Ok if I PM you Scrap?

[ono]

I can't think of any off the top of my head.

ODLH has the best resume i can think of.

There is too much money to be made from having an undefeated fighter and too much to lose from losing one or two fights.

Too many world titles means that a 20-0 fighter with an extremely padded record can fight for a world title.....and then defend it against mandatories, who alos don't really deserve world title shots.

It's more of a business than it is a sport.

[ICB]

Its got to be ODLH he beat Jeff Mayweather with only 4 pro fights, he then beat Troy Dorsey with 6 pro fights, he then won Super Featherweight title with only 11 pro fights. And then after that he fought good opponent's after good opponents. Also Evander Holyfield fought decent opposition then he beat Dwight Muhammad Qawi only after 11 pro fights, he then demolished every single good Cruiserweight there was to beat, he then moved up and started fighting the best the Heavyweight division had to offer.

[RozzySean]

Like almost all fighters, Lennox had some padding early, for the first two years of his career. After that, he fought almost no tomato cans, and he ducked nobody. Looking at his list of fights from 1991 - 2003, it's pretty amazing. He fought a few weak fighters in 1991 when he was defending the Euro belt, but starting with the Ruddock fight, he went on an amazing run.