Well Cotto winning against Mosely is about the samen as PBf beating Oscar in my opinion. And it is unfair to judge Cotto to atg because he may have more then what we are seeing now.
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: How Would Miguel Cotto Have Done Against Elite 90's Welterweights ??
Well Cotto winning against Mosely is about the samen as PBf beating Oscar in my opinion. And it is unfair to judge Cotto to atg because he may have more then what we are seeing now.
Super Moderator
Array
Re: How Would Miguel Cotto Have Done Against Elite 90's Welterweights ??
Give Cotto a chance to accomplish things like beating Margarito and Mayweather, then people will think differently of him.
Old Guard
Array
Re: How Would Miguel Cotto Have Done Against Elite 90's Welterweights ??
I wouldn't rate Cotto any higher if he beats Margarito. The elite 90's WW's were a step up from today's WWs. Tony isn't as good the names listed, other than maybe Quartey.Originally Posted by Master
The current WW division is deep and interesting, but it's not as strong as the Mosley, Tito, Oscar, Quartey era. I would favor Cotto against Quartey, because he's a more complete boxer. I could see Cotto being very competitive with prime Oscar, maybe winning a close one, but I would still give the edge to ODLH. Tito KO's Cotto. Whitaker probably outpoints him. Prime Shane wins. I'm not sure about Lopez. I haven't seen him fight enough to judge.
If Cotto beats Mayweather, perhaps I'll change my opinion.
Re: How Would Miguel Cotto Have Done Against Elite 90's Welterweights ??
Except Mayweather had to move up to a weight class which he has never fought at before. Plus ODLH on fight night was 1 stone heavier than Mayweather so don't you think thats more of a risk ??
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks