Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 48

Thread: Calzaghe Looked Ordinary? Are You Guys Nuts?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    168
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe Looked Ordinary? Are You Guys Nuts?

    Quote Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN View Post
    I selected Joe to win by UD against Hopkins but i was far from impressed, Hopkins is a difficult opponent and i really don't like watching him much. Jones Jr will be a different story and Joe will have to improve on that performance to beat RJJ. I give Jones a good chance of upsetting Calzaghe.
    I agree.

    But if i look at the fights all great fighters have had against nard, they all end up looking either crap wins or getting ko'd or lose themselves.

    RJJ didnt beat him comdortably and taylor's wins were v controversial (exceptionally so the first time)...coupled that bernard easily beat winky and totally shut out tarver, it kind of puts it in perspective.

    JC vs RJJ will be a different style of fight (thankfully), 2 styles where fireworks are garunteed when they clash.

    Id say that if RJJ is totally up for this one then it will be very difficult for calzaghe. If RJJ is how he is in his prime then id favour him to win, but i dont think either fighter is in their prime anymore sadly (i think we saw prime RJJ 6 years back and prime JC 2 years back)...but its only 1 fight. Calzaghe will have to be on great form to beat jones who will obviously be very 'up for it'.

    I'll give it 60/40 to calzaghe in this case. The 40% to jones because jones can catch calzaghe and cause him problems aswell, wouldnt come as a shock if jones won, but im favouring joe.

    Hopkins proved by his close loss to joe that he is a great boxer, and still at 43 a great athlete and a sure hall of famer.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1515
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe Looked Ordinary? Are You Guys Nuts?

    Quote Originally Posted by LondonBB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN View Post
    I selected Joe to win by UD against Hopkins but i was far from impressed, Hopkins is a difficult opponent and i really don't like watching him much. Jones Jr will be a different story and Joe will have to improve on that performance to beat RJJ. I give Jones a good chance of upsetting Calzaghe.
    I agree.

    But if i look at the fights all great fighters have had against nard, they all end up looking either crap wins or getting ko'd or lose themselves.

    RJJ didnt beat him comdortably and taylor's wins were v controversial (exceptionally so the first time)...coupled that bernard easily beat winky and totally shut out tarver, it kind of puts it in perspective.

    JC vs RJJ will be a different style of fight (thankfully), 2 styles where fireworks are garunteed when they clash.

    Id say that if RJJ is totally up for this one then it will be very difficult for calzaghe. If RJJ is how he is in his prime then id favour him to win, but i dont think either fighter is in their prime anymore sadly (i think we saw prime RJJ 6 years back and prime JC 2 years back)...but its only 1 fight. Calzaghe will have to be on great form to beat jones who will obviously be very 'up for it'.

    I'll give it 60/40 to calzaghe in this case. The 40% to jones because jones can catch calzaghe and cause him problems aswell, wouldnt come as a shock if jones won, but im favouring joe.

    Hopkins proved by his close loss to joe that he is a great boxer, and still at 43 a great athlete and a sure hall of famer.
    Roy didn't beat who comfortably? IF your tlaking about Bernard HOpkins he was so sure he was going to win that he gave away the last two roudns to protect his hand, and he still won 116-112, and thus he wanted to it probably owuld have been 118-110

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    None of your buisness.
    Posts
    7,691
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1792
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe Looked Ordinary? Are You Guys Nuts?

    I wouldn't say ordinary, but he didn't look his best. I don't think anyone has looked great against Hopkins, so Calzaghe shouldn't get too much heat for B-Hop's style of fight. My only complaint about Calzaghe is his technique when he throws those flurries otherwise he's a slick boxer with fast hands and great defense.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    None of your buisness.
    Posts
    7,691
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1792
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe Looked Ordinary? Are You Guys Nuts?

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by LondonBB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by THE THIRD MAN View Post
    I selected Joe to win by UD against Hopkins but i was far from impressed, Hopkins is a difficult opponent and i really don't like watching him much. Jones Jr will be a different story and Joe will have to improve on that performance to beat RJJ. I give Jones a good chance of upsetting Calzaghe.
    I agree.

    But if i look at the fights all great fighters have had against nard, they all end up looking either crap wins or getting ko'd or lose themselves.

    RJJ didnt beat him comdortably and taylor's wins were v controversial (exceptionally so the first time)...coupled that bernard easily beat winky and totally shut out tarver, it kind of puts it in perspective.

    JC vs RJJ will be a different style of fight (thankfully), 2 styles where fireworks are garunteed when they clash.

    Id say that if RJJ is totally up for this one then it will be very difficult for calzaghe. If RJJ is how he is in his prime then id favour him to win, but i dont think either fighter is in their prime anymore sadly (i think we saw prime RJJ 6 years back and prime JC 2 years back)...but its only 1 fight. Calzaghe will have to be on great form to beat jones who will obviously be very 'up for it'.

    I'll give it 60/40 to calzaghe in this case. The 40% to jones because jones can catch calzaghe and cause him problems aswell, wouldnt come as a shock if jones won, but im favouring joe.

    Hopkins proved by his close loss to joe that he is a great boxer, and still at 43 a great athlete and a sure hall of famer.
    Roy didn't beat who comfortably? IF your tlaking about Bernard HOpkins he was so sure he was going to win that he gave away the last two roudns to protect his hand, and he still won 116-112, and thus he wanted to it probably owuld have been 118-110
    heh your gonna hate me , but I scored that RJJ fight for B-Hop, go figure

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,705
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1211
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe Looked Ordinary? Are You Guys Nuts?

    Nope, i'm not nuts, not today anyway. I watched the fight again and no doubt Hopkins style made Calzaghe look ordinary in this fight but i also think Joe is ordinary anyway, his win against Kessler certainly impressed me but i would like to see him do it again and not fight these old well past there best legends. Jones jr will give Calzaghe a tough time but expect JC to win.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Who is/was your hero. The person you looked up to?
    By boozeboxer in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-07-2008, 12:09 AM
  2. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-05-2007, 01:52 PM
  3. OK THIS IS DRIVING ME NUTS!!!!!!!
    By DaxxKahn in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-06-2007, 11:05 PM
  4. KEVIN MITCHELS NUTS
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 10-31-2006, 05:45 PM
  5. Arum:Hatton=relatively ordinary!
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-25-2006, 04:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing