Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Should the voluntary defense rule be changed ?!?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Charlottetown, Canada
    Posts
    2,292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2608
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the voluntary defense rule be changed ?!?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikkel_K View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    Good sentiments but I think The Alphabet soup boys and girls would just find a way to muck up the top ten as well,Alot of it comes down to the sanctioning fees and $$$ In general.what is the current # of voluntary defenses before There is a mandated Defense?The Rings policy may not be perfect,but it has helped me detox from the Alphabet syndicates
    Case in point: Erdei's opponent on Saturday was actually ranked #4 (!) by the WBO. I'm fairly sure the Alphabet organizations would find a way to rank Pittman or Ayala in the top 10 as well, if that was what they wanted. I mean, it's already a joke to include Ayala in the top 15 (he is, of course, rated exactly 15), so what would stop the WBA from extending the joke to the top 10?

    That being said I agree with Johnny's basic premise - champions should defend against decent opposition, not be allowed to fight handpicked cab drivers.

    However, only really recognising The Ring - who have no mandatory defenses - might not exactly help in this regard. As I have said before - imagine what Sven Ottke or Pongsaklek Whatshisname would do with a title where they were allowed full control over their opponents and the place of fighting. Beneficial for boxing? Not necessarily...
    Very true. The Alphabet soup are motivated by money, there is no question about that. You can look at the Kessler/Miranda soap opera recently. Miranda jumped from #9 to #2 via the WBA for doing nothing. On the surface, it looks like the WBA is doing a good thing to try to make the fight happen for the belt Kessler wanted. If you look deeper though, they were cutting someone else off who worked hard for their own ranking. Money makes the world of boxing go round for sure.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    182
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    904
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the voluntary defense rule be changed ?!?

    I think it would be better to change it to a top 10, mayve even top 5,6 or 8 opponent in the organisations ratings. Its true the alphabet titles are becoming less credible but they are still the driving force to make and sell bouts. A world title is on the line and that makes money, and money talks. The Rings ratings are seen as best but they don't sanction fights or declare mandatory defence rules, so unless it does, the alphbet titles will be the ones deciding who fights who.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    716
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1222
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the voluntary defense rule be changed ?!?

    Quote Originally Posted by Deanrw View Post
    Very true. The Alphabet soup are motivated by money, there is no question about that. You can look at the Kessler/Miranda soap opera recently. Miranda jumped from #9 to #2 via the WBA for doing nothing. On the surface, it looks like the WBA is doing a good thing to try to make the fight happen for the belt Kessler wanted. If you look deeper though, they were cutting someone else off who worked hard for their own ranking. Money makes the world of boxing go round for sure.
    Exactly. If looking only at that 168 WBA ranking, you could also point out Nader Hamdan, who mysteriously appeared as no. 15 despite no recent wins (he looked absolutely terrible in a 8 round shutout to Mads Larsen prior to this), or Sam Soliman who suddenly appeared as no. 14 without any noticeable recent wins either.

    However, both had already secured dates with Mundine _before_ appearing in the rankings. Coincidence?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Charlottetown, Canada
    Posts
    2,292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2608
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the voluntary defense rule be changed ?!?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikkel_K View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Deanrw View Post
    Very true. The Alphabet soup are motivated by money, there is no question about that. You can look at the Kessler/Miranda soap opera recently. Miranda jumped from #9 to #2 via the WBA for doing nothing. On the surface, it looks like the WBA is doing a good thing to try to make the fight happen for the belt Kessler wanted. If you look deeper though, they were cutting someone else off who worked hard for their own ranking. Money makes the world of boxing go round for sure.
    Exactly. If looking only at that 168 WBA ranking, you could also point out Nader Hamdan, who mysteriously appeared as no. 15 despite no recent wins (he looked absolutely terrible in a 8 round shutout to Mads Larsen prior to this), or Sam Soliman who suddenly appeared as no. 14 without any noticeable recent wins either.

    However, both had already secured dates with Mundine _before_ appearing in the rankings. Coincidence?
    hehe yeah. Gotta love them. Others are just as bad. Look at the WBO as another one with deep pockets that Frank Warren keeps filling.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4428
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the voluntary defense rule be changed ?!?

    I think it should be top 5 and I also think the commisions should recognize champs from other commisions, that way a unification match and mandatory could be one and the same.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Should There Be 3 Knockdown's Rule ??
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 12-19-2007, 04:49 PM
  2. If you could change one rule....
    By SweetPea in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 03-07-2007, 03:08 PM
  3. TV RULE FIGHTS ?
    By Counter in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-04-2007, 11:46 PM
  4. WORST RULE EVER!!!
    By El Kabong in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-25-2006, 12:51 PM
  5. NEW BOXING RULE, FROM ICE :)
    By ICEMAN JDS in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-09-2006, 12:19 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing