NO way Hearns loses to Pavlik. You would see a one sided-exposure that is rarely witnessed in professional sports.
NO way Hearns loses to Pavlik. You would see a one sided-exposure that is rarely witnessed in professional sports.
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
Leonard or Roy Jones Jnr wins that. Probably Jones cuz he is bigger .
Hearns is such an enigma. I could imagine him going in there and starching out Pavlik within two rounds. On the other side of the coin, I can picture him getting overzealous, exposing his chin and getting caught and KTFO while attempting to take Pavlik out.
Hearns would have won so many of the fights he lost by controlling himself better in the ring. I am glad he fought like he did though because he was one of the most exciting fighters to ever lace on the gloves.
Well I think you have a very valid point cat-newpaper-man. I just think that Pavlik is really over-rated right now and that Hearns was a Great.
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
No way Pavlik beats Hearns. The Hitman only lost to the best in his prime and he would pick Kelly apart with his jab and left hook and KO with the right. Pavlik has still too many flaws.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks