Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 48

Thread: Oscar vs PBF II

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4435
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Oscar vs PBF II

    The problem with this high dollar event being a chess match is that this will be the most watched boxing event of the year, and in many cases probably be the only boxing that some casual fans will see all year.
    And while some of us here on the board can appreciate a good tactical bout, the general public can't. IMO this will hurt the sport as a whole more than help, sure ODLH and PBF can pad their off-shore accounts a little more, but it will definately turn off a lot of casual fans. Looking at the bigger picture at boxing as a whole I want it to do better in the publics eye and there are fights that could bring in a swarm of new fans, that would stick around to see more fights. This isn't one of those.

    I only hope that the undercard has something stellar, I look forward to seeing how these two adapt after being in the ring together before there are adjustments both of them can make, but I feel I am in a small minority here, nothing new for me though.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1344
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Oscar vs PBF II

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    The problem with this high dollar event being a chess match is that this will be the most watched boxing event of the year, and in many cases probably be the only boxing that some casual fans will see all year.
    And while some of us here on the board can appreciate a good tactical bout, the general public can't. IMO this will hurt the sport as a whole more than help, sure ODLH and PBF can pad their off-shore accounts a little more, but it will definately turn off a lot of casual fans. Looking at the bigger picture at boxing as a whole I want it to do better in the publics eye and there are fights that could bring in a swarm of new fans, that would stick around to see more fights. This isn't one of those.

    I only hope that the undercard has something stellar, I look forward to seeing how these two adapt after being in the ring together before there are adjustments both of them can make, but I feel I am in a small minority here, nothing new for me though.
    That is EXACTLY my sentiments with this fight. It's not that I don't care to see these two fight again, hell anytime you have two fighters in the ring with as much ability between them as these two, I'll gladly watch with interest. It's just that they doll so much hype into the fight, that the casual fan expects some great action, and then don't even really know what to look for when the bell rings. It's the kind of fight that is guarenteed to attract a lot of new viewers, but almost as much guarenteed not to win them over.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    2,099
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1116
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Oscar vs PBF II

    I think after Oscar's Forbes fight, this upcoming bout has even less interest. (Although that might be discrediting Stevie Forbes slightly)

    To most people it's a given that Floyd is gonna run through him again like a hot knife through butter so fans are getting impatient..especially with Cotto vs Mayweather being such a mouth-watering prospective match up! Bring that fight on already!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    a local pub near you.
    Posts
    7,652
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2851
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Oscar vs PBF II

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    The problem with this high dollar event being a chess match is that this will be the most watched boxing event of the year, and in many cases probably be the only boxing that some casual fans will see all year.
    And while some of us here on the board can appreciate a good tactical bout, the general public can't. IMO this will hurt the sport as a whole more than help, sure ODLH and PBF can pad their off-shore accounts a little more, but it will definately turn off a lot of casual fans. Looking at the bigger picture at boxing as a whole I want it to do better in the publics eye and there are fights that could bring in a swarm of new fans, that would stick around to see more fights. This isn't one of those.

    I only hope that the undercard has something stellar, I look forward to seeing how these two adapt after being in the ring together before there are adjustments both of them can make, but I feel I am in a small minority here, nothing new for me though.
    That is EXACTLY my sentiments with this fight. It's not that I don't care to see these two fight again, hell anytime you have two fighters in the ring with as much ability between them as these two, I'll gladly watch with interest. It's just that they doll so much hype into the fight, that the casual fan expects some great action, and then don't even really know what to look for when the bell rings. It's the kind of fight that is guarenteed to attract a lot of new viewers, but almost as much guarenteed not to win them over.

    PIss on the casual fan. The kind that thinks ODLH is a top 10 fighter. I know if I pay 50 or 60 bucks for any kind of entertainment I do a little research on it. And last year do you know what anyone with an ounce of investigation in them would have found out, "the real thrill is going to be in Vasquez/Marquez.......and its FREE." So fuck the pansy ass ESPN loving bastards.
    "If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.

  5. #5
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Oscar vs PBF II

    Im sorry but it has to be said that those people who had ODLH ahead either didn't pay attention enough to ODLH's flurries missing. Or can't score fight properly or are biased not to sound rude here, but i cannot understand those people who had ODLH ahead. Stats wise it was all Mayweather by a land side and just by watching the fight ODLH was missing majority of his punches and he never really landed a clean shot or even rocked Mayweather once. Mayweather landed much more cleaner effective blows, he rocked ODLH on at least two occasions, and pretty much from a technical point of view dominated ODLH in the later rounds, now through 9 rounds it was close, but after that it was all Mayweather except the 12th round which i gave ODLH giving him the benefit of the doubt, but between 9th round and the 11th, those 3 rounds were clearly Mayweather's IMO. So for the people who had ODLH winning they must of had him well ahead after 9 rounds which i cannot fathom at all.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wales GB
    Posts
    763
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    964
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Oscar vs PBF II

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Im sorry but it has to be said that those people who had ODLH ahead either didn't pay attention enough to ODLH's flurries missing. Or can't score fight properly or are biased not to sound rude here, but i cannot understand those people who had ODLH ahead. Stats wise it was all Mayweather by a land side and just by watching the fight ODLH was missing majority of his punches and he never really landed a clean shot or even rocked Mayweather once. Mayweather landed much more cleaner effective blows, he rocked ODLH on at least two occasions, and pretty much from a technical point of view dominated ODLH in the later rounds, now through 9 rounds it was close, but after that it was all Mayweather except the 12th round which i gave ODLH giving him the benefit of the doubt, but between 9th round and the 11th, those 3 rounds were clearly Mayweather's IMO. So for the people who had ODLH winning they must of had him well ahead after 9 rounds which i cannot fathom at all.
    How many people have said this about having B-Hop ahead?

    Tell you what i saw neither fighter landing anything much at all until about the 9th round when Mayweather came on strong but up until that point alot of the rounds could have gone either way. I had Oscar to far ahed by this point just because he was aggresing. Most of what Mayeather landed was parried from my point of veiw except maybe one or two clean blows...one clean shot dont win you a round though IMO.
    "It wasn't the night of the jab"

  7. #7
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Oscar vs PBF II

    Quote Originally Posted by Tins06 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Im sorry but it has to be said that those people who had ODLH ahead either didn't pay attention enough to ODLH's flurries missing. Or can't score fight properly or are biased not to sound rude here, but i cannot understand those people who had ODLH ahead. Stats wise it was all Mayweather by a land side and just by watching the fight ODLH was missing majority of his punches and he never really landed a clean shot or even rocked Mayweather once. Mayweather landed much more cleaner effective blows, he rocked ODLH on at least two occasions, and pretty much from a technical point of view dominated ODLH in the later rounds, now through 9 rounds it was close, but after that it was all Mayweather except the 12th round which i gave ODLH giving him the benefit of the doubt, but between 9th round and the 11th, those 3 rounds were clearly Mayweather's IMO. So for the people who had ODLH winning they must of had him well ahead after 9 rounds which i cannot fathom at all.
    How many people have said this about having B-Hop ahead?

    Tell you what i saw neither fighter landing anything much at all until about the 9th round when Mayweather came on strong but up until that point alot of the rounds could have gone either way. I had Oscar to far ahed by this point just because he was aggresing. Most of what Mayeather landed was parried from my point of veiw except maybe one or two clean blows...one clean shot dont win you a round though IMO.
    B-Hop vs Calzaghe is totally different fight, but forgetting that yes i like going with aggressive fighter. But it has to be "Effective aggression" meaning get the other fighter off his game plan, and actually landing solid punches, which i didn't see ODLH doing either of those things. Mayweather pot shotted all night and the first 9 rounds were close but no way was ODLH that far ahead after 9 rounds. At least 3 rounds through the first 9 rounds were clearly Mayweather's.

    I think you need to pay a little more attention when ODLH throws his flurries, because most of ODLH's punches hit arms, shoulder, gloves. Mayweather landed the much more cleaner effective blows, and even stunned ODLH twice. Even if you had ODLH ahead after 9 rounds i can't see how you can have him anymore than 2 rounds ahead. All i know is that from technical point of view Mayweather dominated ODLH in the later rounds. And even if you had ODLH winning after 9 rounds i think the later rounds would have been more than enough to give Mayweather the nod.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wales GB
    Posts
    763
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    964
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Oscar vs PBF II

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tins06 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Im sorry but it has to be said that those people who had ODLH ahead either didn't pay attention enough to ODLH's flurries missing. Or can't score fight properly or are biased not to sound rude here, but i cannot understand those people who had ODLH ahead. Stats wise it was all Mayweather by a land side and just by watching the fight ODLH was missing majority of his punches and he never really landed a clean shot or even rocked Mayweather once. Mayweather landed much more cleaner effective blows, he rocked ODLH on at least two occasions, and pretty much from a technical point of view dominated ODLH in the later rounds, now through 9 rounds it was close, but after that it was all Mayweather except the 12th round which i gave ODLH giving him the benefit of the doubt, but between 9th round and the 11th, those 3 rounds were clearly Mayweather's IMO. So for the people who had ODLH winning they must of had him well ahead after 9 rounds which i cannot fathom at all.
    How many people have said this about having B-Hop ahead?

    Tell you what i saw neither fighter landing anything much at all until about the 9th round when Mayweather came on strong but up until that point alot of the rounds could have gone either way. I had Oscar to far ahed by this point just because he was aggresing. Most of what Mayeather landed was parried from my point of veiw except maybe one or two clean blows...one clean shot dont win you a round though IMO.
    B-Hop vs Calzaghe is totally different fight, but forgetting that yes i like going with aggressive fighter. But it has to be "Effective aggression" meaning get the other fighter off his game plan, and actually landing solid punches, which i didn't see ODLH doing either of those things. Mayweather pot shotted all night and the first 9 rounds were close but no way was ODLH that far ahead after 9 rounds. At least 3 rounds through the first 9 rounds were clearly Mayweather's.

    I think you need to pay a little more attention when ODLH throws his flurries, because most of ODLH's punches hit arms, shoulder, gloves. Mayweather landed the much more cleaner effective blows, and even stunned ODLH twice. Even if you had ODLH ahead after 9 rounds i can't see how you can have him anymore than 2 rounds ahead. All i know is that from technical point of view Mayweather dominated ODLH in the later rounds. And even if you had ODLH winning after 9 rounds i think the later rounds would have been more than enough to give Mayweather the nod.
    Alot of DLH's flurries were parried but he was atleast getting through with some shots to the body and they were clean.Mayweather maybe didn't show it but they got in. And i felt Mayweather pot shots were just bouncing off glove, Oscars great at parrying and they looked blocked to me.
    "It wasn't the night of the jab"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. OSCAR VS HATTON BIGGER THEN OSCAR MAYWEATHER?
    By tempostile in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 06-11-2008, 06:24 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-05-2007, 08:21 PM
  3. Winky Wright vs Oscar Delahoya if oscar gets past Floyd.
    By Pro BOXER18 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-27-2007, 06:47 PM
  4. Will Floyd senior train Oscar..? OSCAR SPEAKS
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11-15-2006, 09:05 AM
  5. Oscar Delahoya being oscar delahoya (a coward)
    By frozensolid_702 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 10-05-2006, 03:46 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing