Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: When Rating Fighters................

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4434
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: When Rating Fighters................

    Quality over Quantity any day.

    Of course when fighters take a long time off I start to lose interest in them.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1581
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: When Rating Fighters................

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quality over Quantity any day.

    Of course when fighters take a long time off I start to lose interest in them.
    Exactly, quality is much more important. Joe Frazier and Sonny Liston also made under 4 defenses. BUt they had some huge wins

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,148
    Mentioned
    439 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5131
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: When Rating Fighters................

    Have to echo Lance and Killersheep.....Quality over quantity.Quality on a fight per fight basis, performance In the bouts and Quality of opposition.

    You can beat a top p4p fighter after some sub par matches....that does not automatically warrant p4p inclusion Imo.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    716
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1228
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: When Rating Fighters................

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quality over Quantity any day.
    I agree. But longevity is a quality in itself, and a fighter should get credit for that also.

    To go with RozzySean's example - on his best night Bowe was better than Holyfield has ever been, but for Holyfield to stay at the top so long and continuously facing the very best in the world, I would rate Holyfield above Bowe. I would also rank Calzaghe above Roy Jones, if we were ranking Super Middleweights, even though a prime Roy Jones at SMW could put a beatdown on Calzaghe and still be able to play another game of basketball the same night.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-27-2007, 04:21 AM
  2. How About Rating Tysons Era ??
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-07-2007, 09:15 PM
  3. Rating Question
    By BoxingGorilla in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-22-2006, 07:02 PM
  4. Profile rating
    By cringer in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-18-2006, 10:44 PM
  5. Rating?
    By ringside in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-19-2006, 01:42 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing