 |
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
NZ Golden Boy
Array
Re: When Rating Fighters................
Quality over quantity for me
But I agree with what Mikkel_K is saying. When ranking fighters for the greatest in a division it is not just based on whom would have beaten who. More importantly for me are: quality of opposition, achievement, consistency & performance.
Last edited by Galaxy; 05-16-2008 at 10:34 AM.
The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be
...bigger than Jesus
Array
Re: When Rating Fighters................
I've talked about this quite a few times and said that there is a big diiference between 'The Best' and 'The Greatest' i.e if you rated fighters on who would win on their best night if they all fought, you would have a completely different list to a list where you looked at opposition, titles, lonjgevity, heart etc etc.
I wanna see peoples 'Best' & Greatest' lists and see how they differ - really interesting to me.
Forum P4P Champ
Array
Re: When Rating Fighters................
Talk about covering your bases...Originally Posted by Galaxy
NZ Golden Boy
Array
Re: When Rating Fighters................
True bro haha, missed a couple letters there. Fixed it now.Talk about covering your bases...
Chur brutha
The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks