Quote Originally Posted by ono View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ono View Post
Again it's hard to say that because he looked much better on Saturday night than he did against a much worse opponent 3 years ago (Carlos Maussa).
He didn't look better at all. Maussa was just a nightmare awkward style. Once Hatton calmed down and used his brain he took him out. That Hatton would have stopped Lazcano.

And how can Maussa be much worse than Lazcano?

Maussa KO'd Harris. Lazcano lost to him.
Maussa was shite. Hatton was very very careless against Maussa. Reckless in fact. I don't think any version of Hatton would stop Lazcano.

Harris only lost to Maussa because he spent the 1st 3 rounds swinging for the hills. Every shot bounced off his big stupid head but had no effect on the devil worshipper.

You can't honestly sit there and tell me Carlos Maussa is a better fight than Juan Lazcano
Without them fighting it's impossible to say who is best.

On a formline through Harris it's Maussa.

You think Harris is shit. Witter is shit. Maussa is shit. Yet you're trumpeting Lazcano at 140 - why?