Nonsense what has Jones done more than Pavlik to earn his shot ?? lets use simple logic here Pavlik beat Taylor twice who beat Hopkins twice, and correct me if im wrong but Calzaghe's win over Hopkins is Calzaghe's best win yes ?? and if Taylor defeated Hopkins twice that makes him the better fighter right ?? and Pavlik defeated the man who was better than Hopkins correct ?? so why doesn't Pavlik deserve his shot ?? Calzaghe also said Jones vs Tito was a fight between two old hasbins, so if that is correct why does he want to fight an "old hasbin" the contradiction here is unbelievable.