This May Sound Bitter But Pac isin't A $49.95 Fighter

[:::PSL:::]

Sorry, but as a purist and moron I dished the $49.95 for this PPV, but Pac aint worth it to me, I bought it for my passion for the sport but not for the fighter... People can clown Floyd all they want but he was worth more than Pac...

I was going to say that you just made a fool of your self by making this thread but since it is your opinion It will be respected.

But IMO he just prooved tonight your opinion WRONG!!

Lol

I feel sorry for David. What a beatdown.

It's been a while since I've seen Pac scored a 1 punch KO. And he did it against a fighter who fought once at 146.

[killersheep]

IMO, as I've stated before, It doesn't matter if there is one star it takes good matchmaking for a fight to be worth PPV, nobody is worth it on their own. I know ODLH could sell a ton of PPVs fighting pretty much anyone really, but I'm not gonna be one of those people.

PAC (like any other boxer) is not worth the PPV by themselves, and Diaz was such an obvious mismatch, I elected not to pay for it.

PAC vs. Erik Morales II, now that was worth PPV.

So I kind of agree with you JT, I just think our logic of coming to that conclusion is different.

For me for a PPV to be worth it (speaking only of the main event of course) it requires
1) Great Matchmaking
2) A lot at stake
3) Two fighters that have a chance at winning.

In this case this PPV was clearly set up to give PAC a lightweight belt. And while it is a nice thing for PAC and will look good on his resume it should have been a WCB event not PPV.

[Kev]

How much are most PPV's are they normally cheaper?

$49.95 sounds like a hell of a lot, it cost me £7.99 per month to get Setanta, about $15 and that's for the entire month and they have the UFC.

I think you guys get jobbed on the price really, no way would be 50$ around £25 just to watch a fight, I'd rather Sopcast it for nothing to watch it live and download a perfect copy the next day.

You#re throwing your money down the toilet imo

[JT Rock]

IMO, as I've stated before, It doesn't matter if there is one star it takes good matchmaking for a fight to be worth PPV, nobody is worth it on their own. I know ODLH could sell a ton of PPVs fighting pretty much anyone really, but I'm not gonna be one of those people.

PAC (like any other boxer) is not worth the PPV by themselves, and Diaz was such an obvious mismatch, I elected not to pay for it.

PAC vs. Erik Morales II, now that was worth PPV.

So I kind of agree with you JT, I just think our logic of coming to that conclusion is different.

For me for a PPV to be worth it (speaking only of the main event of course) it requires
1) Great Matchmaking
2) A lot at stake
3) Two fighters that have a chance at winning.

In this case this PPV was clearly set up to give PAC a lightweight belt. And while it is a nice thing for PAC and will look good on his resume it should have been a WCB event not PPV.

Thats what I was getting at Sheep but you are the more elquoent one here... I guess besides the JMM fight his other fights IMO were not paperview worthy because of who he was fighting. The faded Mexican stars the past few year Barrera2 Morales3 ... I mean I know I have to accept Pac as #1 but I wanted to be eased into it a little better than $49.95 thats all. Pac was exciting and he dominated thats all you can really ask for