Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Majesty View Post
Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post

This time I would agree with you eagle.

Naz has bad defense. Pacquaio has overall good defense. In terms of speed and power, Naz would be lesser. In terms of chin, Pacquaio has already proven himself.

Naz could hardly counter Barrera.Pacquaio demolished Barrera in their first fight.

May I know then in what aspect would Naz beat Pac?


How much of Hamed have you watched?
Why? I'm a fan of Hamed..... He was really good. Luisito Espinosa would not have a chance against him but against Pacquaio he was simply inferior in defense and offense. I know you know why...do I need to explain? I suggest you watch his fights.
Hamed was a good counterpuncher and i've seen him having a pretty solid defense, he relied on his reflexes 99 percent of the time but i was pretty sure his defense was pretty good since he started his career as they called a "fancy dan with knockout power" He looked pretty good defensively, he was knocked down by Alicea but he looked pretty good dodging punches in that fight. You think Pacquiao has a better defense then Hamed did? How so?