Pacman v Hamed

[ICB]

Hamed was a good counterpuncher and i've seen him having a pretty solid defense, he relied on his reflexes 99 percent of the time but i was pretty sure his defense was pretty good since he started his career as they called a "fancy dan with knockout power" He looked pretty good defensively, he was knocked down by Alicea but he looked pretty good dodging punches in that fight. You think Pacquiao has a better defense then Hamed did? How so?

Remember a decent Southpaw named Kevin Kelley ?? he had Naz on the canvas 3 times, now just imagine Pacquiao in Kelley's shoes Majesty. Just raising this question to give you something to think about, Naz had terrible balance and he could be countered. And Pacquiao is an underrated counter puncher he even countered a very good counter puncher like Marquez in there 2nd fight.

I remember Kevin Kelley, what was the result of that fight?

Yes Naz won but Kelley scored 3 knockdowns over Naz you honestly think if Pacquiao scored 3 knockdowns over Naz that he would let him off the hook ?? Naz got in too much trouble in that fight based on his poor balance and his weakness to getting countered. Pacquiao is much more faster and stronger than Kelley, and Pacquiao has the skills to counter Naz, and when Pacquiao would counter Naz he would make him pay much more than Kelley did.