Pacman v Hamed

[brucelee]

Its easy to look back retrospectively and say Hamed couldnt have been done, 23 years old?? WTF.

Anyone that followed him from early on could see that he was unravelling before your eyes, 23 or not.

Hamed peaked when he beat Robinson, he went downhill from there.

Peaked against Robinson? Robinson was fucken 21-9 and no more than a decent euro fighter at best!

nice counter there eagle. by the way,how do you know that a boxer is at its peak? simply, Barrera exposed Naz. FACT. Against strong opposition, he will falter. You know why? Coz he's simply not mentally strong. Pac will demolish Naz coz Pac had fought better oppositions and have prevailed.

[eagle]

Its easy to look back retrospectively and say Hamed couldnt have been done, 23 years old?? WTF.

Anyone that followed him from early on could see that he was unravelling before your eyes, 23 or not.

Hamed peaked when he beat Robinson, he went downhill from there.

Peaked against Robinson? Robinson was fucken 21-9 and no more than a decent euro fighter at best!

nice counter there eagle. by the way,how do you know that a boxer is at its peak? simply, Barrera exposed Naz. FACT. Against strong opposition, he will falter. You know why? Coz he's simply not mentally strong. Pac will demolish Naz coz Pac had fought better oppositions and have prevailed.

I hate how they keep giving Naz excuses. Not as good after Ingle, lost focus, blah blah. Point is keeping focus is part of being a top fighter. Pac has the runs on the board against a number of ATG's. Naz fought one and got beat badly. Thats all the reasoning i need to pick Pacman against him.

I usually dont rate Pac as high as some but i still think he would have fucked up the little Prince.