I wont bother watching this fight...
He wins the belt, fair enough, but he is already damamged goods.
He ran his mouth about Haye over and over again...
And we all know the rest...
I wont bother watching this fight...
He wins the belt, fair enough, but he is already damamged goods.
He ran his mouth about Haye over and over again...
And we all know the rest...
So if a fighter loses 1 fight against a very good opponent they should be thrown on the scrapheap? No wonder some promoters/fighters tend to choose easier opponents to keep their 0 in tact, i'd rather see the better fighters fighting the better fighters rather than people going theyre whole career fighting lesser fighters just to keep a nicer looking record. I understand what your saying about Maccarinelli but surely he deserves another shot, the Haye fight was like a rabbit caught in the headlights but I dont think we'll see him like that against Banks.
Sorry i think I didnt make my point.
It would be stupid of anyone not to go get a World Title.
I just mean it means less for Macarinelli, as he is only getting it because the man who destroyed him has left.
Will always be on his mind, he is is not the TRUE World Champion
Banks is mediocre at best. But Maccarinelli is just crap. And has no chin. Banks either stops him or takes a boring UD
You guys are in for a surpriiiiiise. Jonathan Banks is no pushover. He is very composed and can throw bombs. He is a sparring partner for Wladimir Klitschko and he's got a nice chin. If Enzo Mac ate it from Haye in 2 rounds I say he eats it from Banks in 4. 1 showing doesn't make a guy garbage, so if he had a bad outing on the Klitschko-Thompson undercard you're going to realize how very fooled you were come fight night.
Oops
Enzo will crush him, unify cruiser then move t oheavy to take on hay and win
Enzo will have no trouble with banks,ko inside 3 rounds.He wont move to heavyweight anytime soon he aint even a big cruiser.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks