Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post

Bunce just seems so thick to me. Not very articulate and the manner in which he carries himself just causes me to shake my head. They are all pretty lame.
Yeah its like listening to a drunk in a pub talking about boxing , but Bunce is on tv so he should be presenting an experts analysis. He's just a fan who likes boxing but his opinion is no better than anyones else. Its not as if he were a boxer himself. What does he know?

I prefer guys who have been there and done that who can present their insight in a professional way . Not a scummy loudmouth !
You're being too harsh on Bunce. He has a noisy style, yes, but surely you don't disagree with EVERYTHING he says?

You have to understand he is talking back to a presenter that knows nothing about boxing (constant banal questions) and an uninformed audience (the majority of viewers are not hardcore fans like us).

What pundits do you think are good?
I like Glen Mcrory . I think him and Ian Darke should have never been split up cuz they worked well together .

In terms of studio analysis I think Mguigan was good and to the point . Jim Watt was often accurate and they add a certain dignity to the boxing that Bunce takes away .