Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post

Yeah its like listening to a drunk in a pub talking about boxing , but Bunce is on tv so he should be presenting an experts analysis. He's just a fan who likes boxing but his opinion is no better than anyones else. Its not as if he were a boxer himself. What does he know?

I prefer guys who have been there and done that who can present their insight in a professional way . Not a scummy loudmouth !
You're being too harsh on Bunce. He has a noisy style, yes, but surely you don't disagree with EVERYTHING he says?

You have to understand he is talking back to a presenter that knows nothing about boxing (constant banal questions) and an uninformed audience (the majority of viewers are not hardcore fans like us).

What pundits do you think are good?
I like Glen Mcrory . I think him and Ian Darke should have never been split up cuz they worked well together .

In terms of studio analysis I think Mguigan was good and to the point . Jim Watt was often accurate and they add a certain dignity to the boxing that Bunce takes away .
I used to like Glenn and Darke too. But sometimes Darke gets on my nerves when calling these days. Actually, I would go as far as saying he is a pretty poor fight reader - Oscar-Floyd, Hatton-Floyd (maybe it was falsely intentional in Hatton's case ).

McGuigan is too scared to upset anyone in boxing (Warren's mob). That makes him crap.

I like Watt. But he has some absolute SHOCKERS in the commentary box.. especially with his scorecard, which is very inconsistent, and when calling American fights, whenever he gets wind of the HBO card, seems to start favouring the fighter they have winning