Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 66

Thread: If Usain Bolt Wins the 200m As Convincingly as the 100m...

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3383
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If Usain Bolt Wins the 200m As Convincingly as the 100m...

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    There is no way Bolt is going to be even close to as decorated as Phelps I'm not arguing that, and I don't buy the freestyle/butterfly stroke either because how many swimmers compete in both? Nearly all of them. How manny runners compete in both sprints and hurdles? I can't recall any and I imagine you would have to go back a bit to find someone who medaled in both. That can't be a valid comparision.

    And none of Phelps margin of victories were as completely unprecedented as Bolt's who could have won by more 5 lengths if he chose to.
    Well Carl Lewis won Olympic golds in both the 100 meters, 200 meters and Long Jump and then became the only man in history to defend both his 100 meters and Long Jump titles.

    I don't really see any difference at all between 100 and 200 meters to be honest, the best sprinter in the world would naturally be world class over both events.

    Phelps has won both 100 and 400 meter medals in this tournament plus there's much more of a difference between swimming an extra hundred meters and running it.

    Besides am I alone in thinking that running is mostly a matter of genetics, I mean how much skill can there really be in running in a straight line?

    At least swimming involves relatively difficult and unnatural techniques to learn, man not being adapted to the water after all.

    I don't see any reason why a track and field athlete should find it any tougher to dominate multiple events than a swimmer really.

    IF Carl Lewis can win both the 100 meter and 200 meter events plus the Long Jump then why not Bolt?

    He hasn't done as much as Phelps, not even close imo, it just happens that the 100 meters is perhaps the most glamourous event and so gets more publicity.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    960
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1512
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If Usain Bolt Wins the 200m As Convincingly as the 100m...

    I'd like to see Bolt win the 400m, he could win 5 golds that way 100m, 200m, 400m, 4x 100m and 4x 400m. Now that would be a massive achievement. He is a freak of nature though, starting to wind up his run with about 70 m to go and still manages 20.0 something. He could break Michael Johnsons record by the looks of him.
    "There are no ordinary moments"

    Hidden Content

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3383
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If Usain Bolt Wins the 200m As Convincingly as the 100m...

    Quote Originally Posted by Salty View Post
    I'd like to see Bolt win the 400m, he could win 5 golds that way 100m, 200m, 400m, 4x 100m and 4x 400m. Now that would be a massive achievement. He is a freak of nature though, starting to wind up his run with about 70 m to go and still manages 20.0 something. He could break Michael Johnsons record by the looks of him.
    Yeah that would be something to see.

    I see no reason why an athlete like Bolt couldn't dominate several events, like I said Lewis was the Long Jump world record holder as well as a top sprinter.

    It's about time we had a truly great athlete who could do it all.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2914
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If Usain Bolt Wins the 200m As Convincingly as the 100m...

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    There is no way Bolt is going to be even close to as decorated as Phelps I'm not arguing that, and I don't buy the freestyle/butterfly stroke either because how many swimmers compete in both? Nearly all of them. How manny runners compete in both sprints and hurdles? I can't recall any and I imagine you would have to go back a bit to find someone who medaled in both. That can't be a valid comparision.

    And none of Phelps margin of victories were as completely unprecedented as Bolt's who could have won by more 5 lengths if he chose to.
    Well Carl Lewis won Olympic golds in both the 100 meters, 200 meters and Long Jump and then became the only man in history to defend both his 100 meters and Long Jump titles.

    I don't really see any difference at all between 100 and 200 meters to be honest, the best sprinter in the world would naturally be world class over both events.

    Phelps has won both 100 and 400 meter medals in this tournament plus there's much more of a difference between swimming an extra hundred meters and running it.

    Besides am I alone in thinking that running is mostly a matter of genetics, I mean how much skill can there really be in running in a straight line?

    At least swimming involves relatively difficult and unnatural techniques to learn, man not being adapted to the water after all.

    I don't see any reason why a track and field athlete should find it any tougher to dominate multiple events than a swimmer really.

    IF Carl Lewis can win both the 100 meter and 200 meter events plus the Long Jump then why not Bolt?

    He hasn't done as much as Phelps, not even close imo, it just happens that the 100 meters is perhaps the most glamourous event and so gets more publicity.
    Gah I hate disagreeing with you Bilbo, if you can't even acknowledge that sprinting requires some skill or isn't determined at birth then how is anything I'm writing going to mean anything? oh well

    There is a ton of skill that goes in running, the same amount of skill that goes in swimming because half of the battle is just perfecting your technique. Besides, Phelps is 6'4 and has 30 inch legs with a size 15 shoe, if anyone is benefiting from genetics it is him.

    How can you not see the difference between the 100 and 200? The 200m is way different just like a 1 mile and an 8th horse race is way different then a mile and a half horse race. Some people just hit their stride later. Bolt is built much better for the 200m because of how long his legs are. Usually guys with builds like that can't get going so fast which is what has been so amazing about Bolt from day 1. Bolt running 30 MPH isn't what makes him so amazing or a freak of nature, it's the fact that he can generate that speed so quickly. It's something the world has never seen before, if it was all down to genetics Bilbo then every runner in the 100 would be 6'5 and long and lanky not short and compact. What makes the 200 so interesting and so different is because you see more of a variety in body types and that's where you get an interesting mix of front runners and closers, much like horse racing. Bolt I would think is going to be untouchable in the 200 and I agree, I would like to see him run the 400 in the future.

    And I don't think Bolt has ever competed in the long jump, it's a completely different sport. Jumping, running. Why doesn't Michael Phelps do synchronized diving? They both take place in water right? A lot of the American sprinters do do the long jump, Marion Jones also did the long jump but most drop it either in college or once they leave college if they make it that far in competition.
    Last edited by amat; 08-19-2008 at 01:23 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3383
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If Usain Bolt Wins the 200m As Convincingly as the 100m...

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    There is no way Bolt is going to be even close to as decorated as Phelps I'm not arguing that, and I don't buy the freestyle/butterfly stroke either because how many swimmers compete in both? Nearly all of them. How manny runners compete in both sprints and hurdles? I can't recall any and I imagine you would have to go back a bit to find someone who medaled in both. That can't be a valid comparision.

    And none of Phelps margin of victories were as completely unprecedented as Bolt's who could have won by more 5 lengths if he chose to.
    Well Carl Lewis won Olympic golds in both the 100 meters, 200 meters and Long Jump and then became the only man in history to defend both his 100 meters and Long Jump titles.

    I don't really see any difference at all between 100 and 200 meters to be honest, the best sprinter in the world would naturally be world class over both events.

    Phelps has won both 100 and 400 meter medals in this tournament plus there's much more of a difference between swimming an extra hundred meters and running it.

    Besides am I alone in thinking that running is mostly a matter of genetics, I mean how much skill can there really be in running in a straight line?

    At least swimming involves relatively difficult and unnatural techniques to learn, man not being adapted to the water after all.

    I don't see any reason why a track and field athlete should find it any tougher to dominate multiple events than a swimmer really.

    IF Carl Lewis can win both the 100 meter and 200 meter events plus the Long Jump then why not Bolt?

    He hasn't done as much as Phelps, not even close imo, it just happens that the 100 meters is perhaps the most glamourous event and so gets more publicity.
    Gah I hate disagreeing with you Bilbo, if you can't even acknowledge that sprinting requires some skill or isn't determined at birth then how is anything I'm writing going to mean anything? oh well

    There is a ton of skill that goes in running, the same amount of skill that goes in swimming because half of the battle is just perfecting your technique. Besides, Phelps is 6'4 and has 30 inch legs with a size 15 shoe, if anyone is benefiting from genetics it is him.

    How can you not see the difference between the 100 and 200? The 200m is way different just like a 1 mile and an 8th horse race is way different then a mile and a half horse race. Some people just hit their stride later. Bolt is built much better for the 200m because of how long his legs are. Usually guys with builds like that can't get going so fast which is what has been so amazing about Bolt from day 1. Bolt running 30 MPH isn't what makes him so amazing or a freak of nature, it's the fact that he can generate that speed so quickly. It's something the world has never seen before, if it was all down to genetics Bilbo then every runner in the 100 would be 6'5 and long and lanky not short and compact. What makes the 200 so interesting and so different is because you see more of a variety in body types and that's where you get an interesting mix of front runners and closers, much like horse racing. Bolt I would think is going to be untouchable in the 200 and I agree, I would like to see him run the 400 in the future.

    And I don't think Bolt has ever competed in the long jump, it's a completely different sport. Jumping, running. Why doesn't Michael Phelps do synchronized diving? They both take place in water right? A lot of the American sprinters do do the long jump, Marion Jones also did the long jump but most drop it either in college or once they leave college if they make it that far in competition.
    I'm not really disagreeing with you Amat, you know a lot more about the sport of sprinting than I do. To me it's just running in a stright line, but as yuo explained there is more to it than that.

    I agree Phelps is genetically gifted but I would think swimming is harder to master than running just because we are designed to be able run and move around on land but not designed to swim in the water.

    I find athletics to be a lot more interesting than swimming though.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2914
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If Usain Bolt Wins the 200m As Convincingly as the 100m...

    That's a good point about being made to swim. I guess it comes down to billions of potential competitors versus...what you said.

    I guess Phelps may be the most dominant athlete of the games but Bolt so far has been the most impressive imo. That's just off one race though but really that's one of the most impressive performances I've ever seen in all of sport.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3383
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: If Usain Bolt Wins the 200m As Convincingly as the 100m...

    Well got to say Bolt did look pretty awesome in the 200, another world record.

    To beat both the 100 and 200 meter world records in one week is pretty special.

    Let's hope he doesn't get done for drugs immediately following this.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Usain Bolt - 100m Olympic Final
    By Plopeater in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-22-2008, 08:50 AM
  2. I know Cassamayor didnt win convincingly but....
    By Jimanuel Boogustus in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 03-29-2008, 08:27 AM
  3. Replies: 47
    Last Post: 04-15-2007, 01:02 PM
  4. WILL TAYLOR EVER WIN A FIGHT CONVINCINGLY????
    By mafiajoey in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 06-21-2006, 12:36 AM
  5. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-14-2006, 01:32 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing